The recent box-office success of documentary films such as Life (
Indeed, as a genre overlooked by the market for decades, the documentary's sudden popularity seems rather overwhelming. Yet, to those who have been devoted to the industry for years despite sparse funding, it's a validation long overdue.
Non-fictional cinema started to flourish around the lifting of martial law in 1987. Before this time documentary films mainly referred to newsreels, public-service films and propaganda pieces made by state-controlled film companies. Because of strict government monitoring, socially and politically sensitive issues were taboo to documentary filmmakers.
The genre experienced its first revolution around the mid-1980s, when independent filmmakers and social activists picked up their cameras to record and participate in the social and political movements that flowered in those years. The advance and popularization of technology gave filmmakers unprecedented freedom to express themselves with affordable and easy-to-operate filming equipment.
Meanwhile, waves of social movements springing from loosened political control gave filmmakers opportunities to look into subjects and issues hitherto unexplored and unknown to the public.
In the 1990s, government agencies and public institutes started to look at documentary cinema as an important part of cultural industry. Series of collaborations with private groups strengthened the development of the documentary film industry. The quality and quantity of documentaries have both gone up, while training available for young artists has built up a solid base.
Medium of change
Full Shot Foundation (
"Most of the works made by our members deal with social issues. We go to minority groups, communities, or tribes, we stay with them for a long time, and bring out the issues to generate public discussions in the hope to make a change," said president of the foundation Tsai Jing-ru (
But the foundation does more than just make films. "Since 1990, we have held workshops to train anyone who is interested in documentary making on and off depending on our budget," Tsai said. The Council for Cultural Affairs (
"What we do is very challenging for a small group like us. But we take our social responsibilities very seriously," Tsai said. "We make films to open up dialogue and understanding among communities. We provide knowledge and skills to those who want to join the industry. And we seize any chances to show works in any occasion so that more people can see what has been going on in our society."
Public Television Service (
PTS holds a documentary short-film festival every year. They select a group of applicants and assist the inexperienced filmmakers in completing their works and then air them on the channel.
These days, more and more young movie industry talent is making the move to documentary cinema. Some have turned to it out of a sense of social responsibility; others use it merely as another, cheaper way to entertain audiences.
Social record
The co-director of Let It Be Yen Lan-chuan (顏蘭權) was driven to documentary making out of a desire to help people. In 1999, she was amont the filmmakers who went down to Nantou County (南投縣) after the 921 earthquake. She "felt that something more than news reports needed to be made" to document what was going on, so she went down on an impulse to start filming in the disaster area. The group also included Full Shot's founder Wu Yi-feng (吳乙峰), who ended up making Taiwan's most successful documentary ever -- Life (reviewed in the Taipei Times on Sept. 16, 2004). The film chronicled earthquake victims' daily struggle to rebuild in the weeks, months and years after the devastation. The story deeply touched audiences and ticket sales grossed over NT$10 million.
Similarly, Yen's Let It Be tells the story of Taiwan's common people struggling in the face of hardship. This time the stars are Tainan County rice farmers in their 60s and 70s. With the younger generation leaving for the city, the farmers face pressure from not only because of their advancing age but also due to the competition of foreign agricultural imports in the wake of Taiwan's WTO membership.
The idea for the documentary was born while Yen and another director, Cres Juang (
"We saw the situation there and we just knew everything would soon change," Yen said. It was apparent that the rice farmers' way of life was on the brink of extinction. "For example," she said, "there was only man left who owned a cow in the whole village. This was very distressing to us, so we decided to make a documentary about it."
After 15 months of filming the elderly farmers and another 15 spent cutting 350 hours of footage down to two hours, the directors had their documentary, but they had no idea what to expect from the public. Yen was afraid that nobody would want to watch the film. "It's long and slow and it's about peasants, which is not popular subject matter in Taiwan these days."
Yet the sweet, simple honesty of the characters in Let It Be won over the hearts of audiences all over Taiwan and the documentary pulled in NT$6 million at the box office.
Jumping genres
Lin Yu-hsien (
He says he got into documentaries "by accident" when, a few years ago, he found himself out of work due to the movie industry's slump. "There were no movies for us to work on, so we decided to make our own movies," Lin said. "We didn't have much of a budget, so we chose to start with documentaries."
After making a few short documentaries, Lin headed home to Ilan (
But Lin and his filmmaking partner Chuang Ching-shen (
While not downplaying the success of documentary cinema, Lin feels it is not the solution to Taiwan's movie woes some are hailing it as.
"Lately everybody feels that documentaries are popular and great and that they can save Taiwan's film industry, so we should all just stick to making documentaries. But this is wrong," Lin said. "I think we were noticed because we provided a different style of movie. Taiwan's movies are too depressing: Life is hardship and people don't to go to the theater to see more hardship. Our film is energetic and funny, and that's why people noticed it -- not because it is a documentary."
Jump! Boys can be rented from Blockbuster or Asia1 (
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS