In a prefabricated shed crammed with cooking utensils, a TV set, personal items and a single bed, a former leprosy patient named Chen Zai-tien (
(
"Most of the residents have lived here for more than 50 years now. Lots of us were sent here in our teens or 20s and have been cut off from society ever since. Now the average age of the residents is 75. This is our home. All we ask is that the government can leave us along and let us live our lives here in peace.''
PHOTOS: LO PEI-DER, TAIPEI TIMES
Chen is one of over 300 former lepers living at the sanatorium. The colony has been a haven for them for 75 years, but is set to be demolished to make room for the Taipei Mass Rapid Transit system's Sinjhuang line. The residents of Happy Life Sanatorium are now being told they will have to relocate to the eighth-floor of Huilung Community Hospital, built on part of the original site of the sanatorium.
Supported by several advocate groups such as the Taiwan Association of Human Rights and Taiwan Youth Union for Lepers' Rights, the former lepers have petitioned government agencies to stay, including the Taipei County Government, the Legislative Yuan, the Council for Cultural Affairs (CAA) and Executive Yuan.
So far, their efforts to remain at Happy Life Sanatorium are foundering and the relocation plan is slated to go ahead on Aug. 15.
PHOTOS: LO PEI-DER, TAIPEI TIMESN
Happy Life Sanatorium in Danfeng Neighborhood, Sinjhuang Township (新莊鎮), Taipei County, was built in 1930 under Japanese colonial rule as the first and the only public leper colony in Taiwan. The Japanese regime imposed a segregation policy on the patients. They deprived lepers of the freedom to move, marry or have offspring. In the 1950s, new treatments for leprosy became available in Taiwan and leprosy, also know as Hansen's Disease, was found to be a curable chronic illness, with a low likelihood of transmission.
In 1994, the health department ceded the 17-hectare property belonging to the leper colony to the Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation for the construction of the Sinjhuang MRT Line. It was intended to house the former lepers in a modern regional hospital, though the residents were excluded from the decision-making process. Many residents didn't even know their homes were sold to the MRT until the construction work began in 2002.
``The authority never secured consent from the residents. They were never asked if they wanted to move or not. They were just told to leave the houses they'd lived in for decades. And all the buildings were torn down in three days,'' said Lai Ze-jun (賴澤君), a graduate student volunteer of Taiwan Youth Union for Lepers' Rights, referring to the first stage of demolition work that took place in 2002 and 2003.
According to interviews compiled by the Union, many of the former lepers were forced to move out of the original sanator-ium composed of elegant Japanese buildings to prefabricated sheds or temporary settlements nearby. Many of the residents lived with their families, who are not neces-sarily leprosy patients. The family members were offered NT$10,000 in compensation to move out.
A few residents were paralyzed in accidents during the relocation and one man had to have one of his legs amputated because the move worsened his leg condition. A blind patient fell to death shortly after the move simply because he couldn't "touch" his way through his new environment.
The hospital authority has adopted "soft" coercion techniques to persuade the former lepers to agree to move, according to the residents and volunteer workers.
PHOTOS: LO PEI-DER, TAIPEI TIMES
``The hospital asks the staff to talk the residents into believing how great the new hospital is. Meanwhile, the hospital gra-dually withdraws the medical resources and personnel and refuses to carry out the needed maintenance work for the damaged, leaking houses,'' Lai said.
Huilung Community Hospital is a two-building complex designed to provide me-dical treatment for the general public. The former lepers will be placed in wards on the fourth and eighth floors of the building. Advocate groups believe some of the more elderly patients will find it difficult to deal with the physical environment of the building. For example, many residents are wheelchair-bound, but the building is equipped with just two elevators. Also, pressing the buttons of the elevator is
difficult for those who have lost their
fingers due to infection.
The legal representative for Hansen's Disease patients, Wu Xu-zhou (吳旭洲), believes the overall design of the hospital fails to meet basic living requirements and seriously violates the residents' rights to live safely and without fear.
Other advocates for the patients say that hospital care is a retrograde step, while advanced countries are moving toward community care. In the minds of many leper patient representatives, relocating residents to the new hospital is the same as being quarantined.
"We have made an appeal to put the demolition plan on hold while we take the case to the court, and we will also tackle the legal issues of the health authority selling properties [where ownership is unclear] in the sanatorium to the MRT," Wu said.
As the only public leprosy hospital built during the colonial period, Happy Life Sanatorium is one of the few historical sites that bear witness to the development of public health in Taiwan. It is one of 60 similar sanatoriums around the world. Since 2001, however, the Taipei County Government Cultural Affairs Bureau has repeatedly failed to meet the requests from local cultural and historical preservation groups to upgrade the historical value of the sanatorium and thereby preserve it.
In January, the newly revised Cultural Heritage Preservation Law (文化資產保存法), which allows the Council for Cultural Affairs to stop local governments if they are threa-tening to destroy heritage sites, was passed. The tricky part is that the CAA can't review the leper colony operation before the Executive Yuan completes legal procedures and publicly announces the revised articles of the law. So far, the nation's highest policy-making body has yet to put the law into effect.
PHOTOS: LO PEI-DER, TAIPEI TIMES
In view of the looming deadline for relocation, the Taiwan Youth Union for Lepers' Rights has called on advocate groups and individuals to stay with residents at the colony to raise social awareness of what is going on. As for the residents themselves, more than 200 patients have already signed a formal requisition to stay.
"We are 70 to 80-years old. You can't imagine how frightening this is to us to not know what will happen next," Chen said, "but we won't give in. We want the authority to preserve what is left of our homes."
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS