In the 1950s there were three prominent Asian leaders who were also Christians -- Taiwan's Chiang Kai-shek (
But before looking at what it has to say about him, it's important to explain just what is Seth Jacobs' ruling theory.
Jacobs believes that religion played a far greater part in American involvement in Vietnam's affairs than has hitherto been realized. Asia was perceived by the policy-makers on Capitol Hill as an area about to be taken over by atheists, Communists receiving their orders from the godless citadel of Moscow.
In addition to this, Asians themselves were seen as passive by nature, easily swayed, and for the most part adherents of a religion, Buddhism, that encouraged just such passivity. For them to have Buddhist leaders was therefore not enough.
Christians, stalwarts in their opposition to godlesness in all its forms, were the only individuals capable of leading these mild-mannered people in resisting the monster from the north.
In order to support this analysis, which goes against the Marxist view that the motives for almost everything are economic, Jacobs looks at the diplomatic exchanges between top American statesmen of the 1950s and their representatives in southeast Asia. He also looks at some key books that succeeded in shaping American public opinion about the region in that distant era. All these sources emphasized the religious nature of the struggle.
This might be of merely academic interest were it not for the quite extraordinary parallels with the situation today. In 2005, we see once again a heavy American presence in a distant land with strong religious reasons given for that involvement. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are all reported to hold apocalyptic views about the cosmic battle in which they are involved.
The Axis of Evil, heir to Reagan's Evil Empire, once again puts religion in the front line, and in addition a handful of bizarre books are again credited with lying behind the American administration's thinking.
The similarities don't end here. In the run-up to the war in Vietnam, a coalition, in effect of "the willing," was put together, involving Australia, New Zealand and a handful of other countries, in order to give an international gloss to what was essentially an American commitment.
An anti-atheistic crusade was announced -- a term still thought permissible in those days -- and the entire project was presented under a "slavery versus freedom" flag. The parallels with today, in other words, are terrifyingly exact.
First among the books to rally American opinion in favor of action in Southeast Asia was Tom Dooley's Deliver Us from Evil, described by Jacobs as "a brilliant piece of Cold-War propaganda in which the communist enemy was irredeemably evil and the Americans and their South Vietnamese allies were virtue incarnate."
Dooley was a medic who had witnessed the "Passage to Freedom" exodus of refugees from Communist-held North Vietnam to the south in 1954 and 1955. Atrocity stories were his speciality, notably ones of Catholic priests with nails hammered into their skulls in mocking imitation of Christ's crown of thorns. The suppurating wounds of the Vietnamese refugees themselves, though also graphically described, tended to get second place.
Deliver Us from Evil is described by Jacobs as "racist, lacking in subtlety, and barren of even a sketchy awareness of the complexities of Vietnamese history and politics." Even so, the powerful men in Washington all read it, and so, it seems, did a large proportion of the American people.
The fact that Dooley was gay, and was dishonorably discharged from the US forces, though without the public humiliation usually accompanying such a dismissal, was hushed up. Dooley had become a far too useful propagandist for the publicizing of such facts to be permitted.
Graham Greene's novel The Quiet American was a very different matter. Highly praised in Europe, it was excoriated in the US press. What's more, when it was filmed by Oscar-winning director Joseph Mankiewicz, the book's entire argument was reversed, and the satirized American, Pyle, displayed as a whiter-than-white hero.
The contrast between European and American attitudes is yet another parallel with more recent events.
Another theme of the era in America was fear that the US had become too soft to stand up to the Reds. The book that most compellingly argued that, Lederer and Burdick's The Ugly American, is also subjected to extended analysis in this book.
Vietnamese politics, always complex as they involved differences between north and south, the claims of at least four different religions, as well as the very different attitudes of the French and the Americans (the area's two outside tormentors), are also presented here with unusual clarity. Jacobs' style is notably vivid and forceful, while nowhere evading the convolutions of the actual situation on the ground.
And Vietnam was a famously complicated place. During World War II, for instance, the US had supported Ho Chi Minh, just as it was later in Iraq to support Saddam Hussein. This time it was because Ho was resisting the Japanese, who had been allowed to base troops in Vietnam by the pro-Nazi French government based in Vichy.
Again, Ngo Dinh Diem had to fight off many opponents, the Communists apart, in order to gain full US backing.
He was eventually murdered in November 1963 in Saigon's Chinese "Cholon" district by order of a clutch of conspiring generals. His rule had been characterized by cruelty, despite the hero's monikers bestowed on him by Washington -- the "miracle man of Asia," "Asia's Churchill," and so forth.
As for Chiang Kai-shek, this book has some interesting things to say about why he was so dear to the hearts of Americans, and why, for example, he appeared 10 times on the cover of Time magazine, more than anyone else has ever achieved.
This is a fine book. The author says that studies of how the US became involved in Vietnam have become a virtual academic cottage industry, but he went ahead with this book nonetheless because he believed he had a new angle on those much-discussed and much-disputed events.
Such 1950s figures as President Eisenhower and John Foster Dulles also come in for some new analyses, for the most part pointing out the religious perspective they adopted when viewing foreign affairs.
The inevitable conclusion you reach after reading this fascinating book is that while so much has changed in the world, some things have not changed at all.
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS