Is every 4-year-old a Marla Olmstead?
Marla is the preschool painter from Binghamton, New York, who has had her own gallery show. The gallery owner who represents her -- because what 4-year-old doesn't need gallery representation? -- is charging US$6,000 for her latest works. Never mind whether she is a larger-than-life talent: Every canvas she splatters and scrapes her way across is larger than she is.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
No doubt some parents who heard about her accomplishments said to themselves, "My 4-year-old could do that."
In an experiment that touched on how creativity emerges, how it is nurtured and how the skills needed for painting differ from those needed for, say, piano playing, a group of 4-year-olds was asked to try its hand at oil on canvas. Later, the children's paintings were shown to an adult with credentials in early education and long experience in children's art, Andrew S. Ackerman, the executive director of the Children's Museum of Manhattan.
Painting with oil on canvas was something of a stretch for artists accustomed to tempera and construction paper. But their art teacher at the Weekday School at the Riverside Church in Manhattan, Naomi Hudson-Knapp -- "Miss Naomi" to the children -- was ready to start them off as soon as they slithered into their smocks.
She began by explaining that oil paint is "smooth and silky" and different from anything they had used before. Not only that, but the canvas they would paint on had a texture different from paper, a bit bumpy and a bit resistant, even to a brush loaded with paint.
She also explained that the wooden board with little dabs of paint was called a palette.
Finally she told the children they could choose their brushes: wide, narrow or in-between.
The 4-year-olds went to work in a noisy blur of creativity. In less time than it takes Big Bird to run through the alphabet, Isabelle Harris, a little girl in a yellow smock, announced, "I made a Jackson Pollock."
A Jackson Pollock?
"It's the one that was at the Metropolitan Museum," she said.
Across the room her mother, Cydney Harris, knew exactly what Isabelle was talking about: Pollock's Autumn Rhythm, which is considered an incomparable example of Abstract Expressionism, and is also one of the largest and most important examples of his poured technique. Preschoolers know the painting from Olivia, the picture book by Ian Falconer about a precocious pig who sees it at the Met and then goes home and imitates it.
Isabelle -- "she loves art but is not very good," Harris said -- had seen Autumn Rhythm in a book at home and declared, "That scares me." This was before Harris talked her into going to the Met one day after a visit to the doctor.
Isabelle recognized Autumn Rhythm from a distance and trotted toward it, raising her arms as if to embrace it. "She said: `It doesn't scare me. It's beautiful. Look at all the colors,'" Harris said. "We stood there for 30 minutes and had a huge discussion about which way to hang it."
The question remained, could she be the next prodigy with a paintbrush? What about her classmate Matthew Popkin, who explained that his painting depicted "some sort of criminal" that skulks around at night? What about Alice Wright, who had worked at the one easel in the classroom (the other children had sat around a large table)? Before she wiggled out of her purple smock, Alice said her canvas of wide and mostly vertical reddish-orange brush strokes, which trailed off in drippy, runny pastels near the bottom, "doesn't really show anything" and was "just a bunch of paint."
Later, when high-resolution images of six of the children's paintings were sent by e-mail to Ackerman of the Children's Museum, he said Alice's painting was the one that he would show to other adults to see what they thought the painter was trying to depict.
"The difference is, a painter is trying to depict something," he said. "A child is just exploring."
He added: "Sometimes, when a child creates something, if it happens to hit the sweet spot of what we think modern art or abstract art is, then the adult steps back and says, `Wow, look at what the child has created,' when in fact, the child who's created something that looks sophisticated to us may just be doing the same thing as every other 4-year-old."
The experiment -- having 4-year-olds paint, and then having Ackerman review the results -- touched on more than innate talent, he said. "What's interesting about young children and art is they not only have to have the eye of a visual thinker, but the manual dexterity," he said.
Marla Olmstead, the 4-year-old with the gallery show, long ago passed the stage of experimentation. But, as with Matthew's criminal, what an artist of 4 says a painting represents may be an afterthought, some child development specialists say.
"The value of actually being a child is you are for the most part residing in a world where you are not aware of what you can't be doing just yet, so children, by their nature, are unguarded, uncensored," said Dr. Regina Lara, medical director of the child psychiatric outpatient department at the Mount Sinai Medical Center.
So, will Marla still be painting at, say, 6? Or will she outgrow her career?
"If painting is a huge part of her world, she may continue to embrace it or she may let go of it," said Hudson-Knapp, the art teacher. "If you're familiar with the vocabulary from the time you're 1, by the time you're 4, you're familiar with the medium. You're comfortable with it, so when you have an idea you want to express, you know how to do it."
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
President William Lai’s (賴清德) March 13 national security speech marked a turning point. He signaled that the government was finally getting serious about a whole-of-society approach to defending the nation. The presidential office summarized his speech succinctly: “President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
RSS