Is every 4-year-old a Marla Olmstead?
Marla is the preschool painter from Binghamton, New York, who has had her own gallery show. The gallery owner who represents her -- because what 4-year-old doesn't need gallery representation? -- is charging US$6,000 for her latest works. Never mind whether she is a larger-than-life talent: Every canvas she splatters and scrapes her way across is larger than she is.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
No doubt some parents who heard about her accomplishments said to themselves, "My 4-year-old could do that."
In an experiment that touched on how creativity emerges, how it is nurtured and how the skills needed for painting differ from those needed for, say, piano playing, a group of 4-year-olds was asked to try its hand at oil on canvas. Later, the children's paintings were shown to an adult with credentials in early education and long experience in children's art, Andrew S. Ackerman, the executive director of the Children's Museum of Manhattan.
Painting with oil on canvas was something of a stretch for artists accustomed to tempera and construction paper. But their art teacher at the Weekday School at the Riverside Church in Manhattan, Naomi Hudson-Knapp -- "Miss Naomi" to the children -- was ready to start them off as soon as they slithered into their smocks.
She began by explaining that oil paint is "smooth and silky" and different from anything they had used before. Not only that, but the canvas they would paint on had a texture different from paper, a bit bumpy and a bit resistant, even to a brush loaded with paint.
She also explained that the wooden board with little dabs of paint was called a palette.
Finally she told the children they could choose their brushes: wide, narrow or in-between.
The 4-year-olds went to work in a noisy blur of creativity. In less time than it takes Big Bird to run through the alphabet, Isabelle Harris, a little girl in a yellow smock, announced, "I made a Jackson Pollock."
A Jackson Pollock?
"It's the one that was at the Metropolitan Museum," she said.
Across the room her mother, Cydney Harris, knew exactly what Isabelle was talking about: Pollock's Autumn Rhythm, which is considered an incomparable example of Abstract Expressionism, and is also one of the largest and most important examples of his poured technique. Preschoolers know the painting from Olivia, the picture book by Ian Falconer about a precocious pig who sees it at the Met and then goes home and imitates it.
Isabelle -- "she loves art but is not very good," Harris said -- had seen Autumn Rhythm in a book at home and declared, "That scares me." This was before Harris talked her into going to the Met one day after a visit to the doctor.
Isabelle recognized Autumn Rhythm from a distance and trotted toward it, raising her arms as if to embrace it. "She said: `It doesn't scare me. It's beautiful. Look at all the colors,'" Harris said. "We stood there for 30 minutes and had a huge discussion about which way to hang it."
The question remained, could she be the next prodigy with a paintbrush? What about her classmate Matthew Popkin, who explained that his painting depicted "some sort of criminal" that skulks around at night? What about Alice Wright, who had worked at the one easel in the classroom (the other children had sat around a large table)? Before she wiggled out of her purple smock, Alice said her canvas of wide and mostly vertical reddish-orange brush strokes, which trailed off in drippy, runny pastels near the bottom, "doesn't really show anything" and was "just a bunch of paint."
Later, when high-resolution images of six of the children's paintings were sent by e-mail to Ackerman of the Children's Museum, he said Alice's painting was the one that he would show to other adults to see what they thought the painter was trying to depict.
"The difference is, a painter is trying to depict something," he said. "A child is just exploring."
He added: "Sometimes, when a child creates something, if it happens to hit the sweet spot of what we think modern art or abstract art is, then the adult steps back and says, `Wow, look at what the child has created,' when in fact, the child who's created something that looks sophisticated to us may just be doing the same thing as every other 4-year-old."
The experiment -- having 4-year-olds paint, and then having Ackerman review the results -- touched on more than innate talent, he said. "What's interesting about young children and art is they not only have to have the eye of a visual thinker, but the manual dexterity," he said.
Marla Olmstead, the 4-year-old with the gallery show, long ago passed the stage of experimentation. But, as with Matthew's criminal, what an artist of 4 says a painting represents may be an afterthought, some child development specialists say.
"The value of actually being a child is you are for the most part residing in a world where you are not aware of what you can't be doing just yet, so children, by their nature, are unguarded, uncensored," said Dr. Regina Lara, medical director of the child psychiatric outpatient department at the Mount Sinai Medical Center.
So, will Marla still be painting at, say, 6? Or will she outgrow her career?
"If painting is a huge part of her world, she may continue to embrace it or she may let go of it," said Hudson-Knapp, the art teacher. "If you're familiar with the vocabulary from the time you're 1, by the time you're 4, you're familiar with the medium. You're comfortable with it, so when you have an idea you want to express, you know how to do it."
Last week saw the appearance of another odious screed full of lies from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian (肖千), in the Financial Review, a major Australian paper. Xiao’s piece was presented without challenge or caveat. His “Seven truths on why Taiwan always will be China’s” presented a “greatest hits” of the litany of PRC falsehoods. This includes: Taiwan’s indigenous peoples were descended from the people of China 30,000 years ago; a “Chinese” imperial government administrated Taiwan in the 14th century; Koxinga, also known as Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), “recovered” Taiwan for China; the Qing owned
In Taiwan’s politics the party chair is an extremely influential position. Typically this person is the presumed presidential candidate or serving president. In the last presidential election, two of the three candidates were also leaders of their party. Only one party chair race had been planned for this year, but with the Jan. 1 resignation by the currently indicted Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) two parties are now in play. If a challenger to acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) appears we will examine that race in more depth. Currently their election is set for Feb. 15. EXTREMELY
Jan. 20 to Jan. 26 Taipei was in a jubilant, patriotic mood on the morning of Jan. 25, 1954. Flags hung outside shops and residences, people chanted anti-communist slogans and rousing music blared from loudspeakers. The occasion was the arrival of about 14,000 Chinese prisoners from the Korean War, who had elected to head to Taiwan instead of being repatriated to China. The majority landed in Keelung over three days and were paraded through the capital to great fanfare. Air Force planes dropped colorful flyers, one of which read, “You’re back, you’re finally back. You finally overcame the evil communist bandits and
They increasingly own everything from access to space to how we get news on Earth and now outgoing President Joe Biden warns America’s new breed of Donald Trump-allied oligarchs could gobble up US democracy itself. Biden used his farewell speech to the nation to deliver a shockingly dark message: that a nation which has always revered its entrepreneurs may now be at their mercy. “An oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms,” Biden said. He named no names, but his targets were clear: men like Elon Musk
RSS