Why does one go to the cinema? For some, it is to escape the reality of life. For Anika Tokarchuk, cinema is the reality of her life. For the past six years, her existence has revolved around the shifting images, sounds, and characters on the screen. Recently, the Canadian filmmaker who is now living in Taipei debuted her documentary, Life as Cinema, on Public Television Service (PTS,
What started off in 1998 as a documentary on the making of The Cup by Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche led Tokarchuk on a journey from Canada through Europe, India and finally to Taiwan. Her project has turned into a three-part series, drawing on support from respected members of the Taiwanese film industry and various buddhist organizations.
"This documentary started off as Rinpoche's idea," Tokarchuk said. "Of course, I really was excited about it, but I had no idea how incredible and how wild the adventure would be. I've lived through this whole amazing experience while making this film, and by doing so I think it has molded the character of the film."
PHOTO COURTESY OF ANIKA TOKARCHUK,IMAGE LANTERN PICTURES LTD
At first, the road was smooth. With a conditional approval for funding through the Canadian film and television industry, Tokarchuk left to begin shooting in India. Six months later, however, on the same day she received permission to interview the Dalai Lama, the offer for funding was unexpectedly withdrawn. Having explored all avenues for financial support before leaving Canada, Tokarchuk felt returning was not an option. To make things worse, she had only US$200 remaining and no return flight.
"It really felt like a dead end to go back. And plus I had my film 80 percent made, it's kind of like if you are seven months pregnant you can't have an abortion, you have to go through with it," she said.
Contemplating her next move, Tokarchuk remained in Dharamshala, where she met a number of individuals teaching English in north-east Asia. Taiwan, a prosperous English teaching market and a country with a growing relationship with Tibet -- both in funding and number of dharma students -- seemed to offer the best environment for Anika's film.
PHOTO COURTESY OF ANIKA TOKARCHUK,IMAGE LANTERN PICTURES LTD
A coincidental meeting with the well-known Taiwanese director, Stan Lai (
Two years went by and Tokarchuk took up residence in Taiwan as an English teacher. After earning enough money to furbish her own home film studio, she was ready to begin the arduous job of editing. An increasingly visible future slowly emerged through a web of connections, one of which is Hung Hung (
Associate director of Life as Cinema, Hung encouraged
PHOTO COURTESY OF ANIKA TOKARCHUK,IMAGE LANTERN PICTURES LTD
Tokarchuk to "go wild" with the 200-hours of footage. "It is much more than a film to her," said Hung, "It is a journey of discovery and the Buddhist dharma that she was practicing through the making of this film. She needed to continue, to finish the project."
Hung said that, to some people, the film might be too experimental in its approach. "Some films need to be seen twice to be understood," he said, implying it's not easy to digest a real meal after being fed junk food for so long.
Sylvia Feng (
PHOTO COURTESY OF ANIKA TOKARCHUK,IMAGE LANTERN PICTURES LTD
One scene in the documentary covers a discussion held at the famed Wisteria Tea House in Taipei. Feng said, "No Taiwanese photographer could capture the aura of Wisteria Tea House [a popular meeting place for"intellectuals'] better than Anika [Tokarchuk] ... her visualization of the intellectual culture in Taipei may spark enlightenment for Taiwanese directors."
The appreciation of Tokarchuk's film, however, goes beyond just artistic or intellectual circles. The Hao Ran Foundation (
Another supporter, Su-Jei Own (
PHOTO COURTESY OF ANIKA TOKARCHUK, IMAGE LANTERN PICTURES LTD
Tokarchuk's experience of making the film changed her perceptions, as she thought they would. "The experience that I've gone through has been my version of living through the themes in Life as Cinema. It really has been this experience of living in this amazing reality."
Nov. 11 to Nov. 17 People may call Taipei a “living hell for pedestrians,” but back in the 1960s and 1970s, citizens were even discouraged from crossing major roads on foot. And there weren’t crosswalks or pedestrian signals at busy intersections. A 1978 editorial in the China Times (中國時報) reflected the government’s car-centric attitude: “Pedestrians too often risk their lives to compete with vehicles over road use instead of using an overpass. If they get hit by a car, who can they blame?” Taipei’s car traffic was growing exponentially during the 1960s, and along with it the frequency of accidents. The policy
While Americans face the upcoming second Donald Trump presidency with bright optimism/existential dread in Taiwan there are also varying opinions on what the impact will be here. Regardless of what one thinks of Trump personally and his first administration, US-Taiwan relations blossomed. Relative to the previous Obama administration, arms sales rocketed from US$14 billion during Obama’s eight years to US$18 billion in four years under Trump. High-profile visits by administration officials, bipartisan Congressional delegations, more and higher-level government-to-government direct contacts were all increased under Trump, setting the stage and example for the Biden administration to follow. However, Trump administration secretary
In mid-1949 George Kennan, the famed geopolitical thinker and analyst, wrote a memorandum on US policy towards Taiwan and Penghu, then known as, respectively, Formosa and the Pescadores. In it he argued that Formosa and Pescadores would be lost to the Chine communists in a few years, or even months, because of the deteriorating situation on the islands, defeating the US goal of keeping them out of Communist Chinese hands. Kennan contended that “the only reasonably sure chance of denying Formosa and the Pescadores to the Communists” would be to remove the current Chinese administration, establish a neutral administration and
A “meta” detective series in which a struggling Asian waiter becomes the unlikely hero of a police procedural-style criminal conspiracy, Interior Chinatown satirizes Hollywood’s stereotypical treatment of minorities — while also nodding to the progress the industry has belatedly made. The new show, out on Disney-owned Hulu next Tuesday, is based on the critically adored novel by US author Charles Yu (游朝凱), who is of Taiwanese descent. Yu’s 2020 bestseller delivered a humorous takedown of racism in US society through the adventures of Willis Wu, a Hollywood extra reduced to playing roles like “Background Oriental Male” but who dreams of one day
RSS