The sun touched the horizon as the ferry Saint Anne left the port of Ouranoupolis. On deck, a group of black-robed monks shifted crates of vegetables and a pair of unshaven backpackers sipped coffee and waved goodbye to me.
They were going to a place frozen in time and history: Mount Athos, also known as Aghion Oros, or holy mountain.
I was left behind. As a woman, I am forbidden from setting foot there.
For more than 1,000 years, Mount Athos has been the heart of the Greek Orthodox Church and the exclusive domain of monks and other holy men.
Set on the easternmost Chalkidiki peninsula in northern Greece, Mount Athos is a rugged outcropping of sheer cliffs and massive pine forests dominated by a craggy peak rising 2,033m from the sea.
Twenty large monasteries form the autonomous state of Aghion Oros which is home to nearly 2,000 monks of all ages and walks of life.
The monks live much as they have since the first solitary hermits established the ascetic stronghold in the fourth century. They have no personal possessions, no money, no television and no luxuries.
Their daily life is filled with religious services and meals, starting with the ritual singing of psalms at 4am and ending with vespers in the early evening.
Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, is a regular visitor, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the late assassinated Serbian prime minister Zoran Djindjic and English humorist Edward Lear all made trips to the monastic community.
What is it that draws these men to visit the Holy Mountain? Could it be the beautiful surroundings, the tranquility, the frescoes?
Perhaps it is because Mount Athos is the only region in the world where you are guaranteed not to bump into women.
The ban, which includes all images of women as well as all female animals, was first decided 1,000 years ago after the Virgin Mary came to the peninsula and established Athos as a holy garden, declaring that women must never again set foot there for all eternity.
Women are forbidden within 500m of the pristine coastline of Mount Athos. The military and coast guards enforce strict controls and any woman caught trying to sneak in disguised as a man risks a prison sentence of two months to one year under a 1953 penal law.
But now the severe laws of the peninsula enclave now face their greatest challenge: European Union legislation on gender discrimination.
Anna Karamanou, a member of the European Parliament and the Chairperson of the Committee of Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities, insists the ban is unfair as women pay taxes towards the upkeep of the monasteries and the preservation of cultural treasures which belong to both men and women.
Karamanou said the ban was imposed 1,000 years ago when Europe was in the dark grip of the Middle Ages and reflects the social reality of those times.
She said it has no meaning today as it contradicts the modern understanding of human rights and the Christian faith itself. No tradition and no custom can be above the respect of human rights and dignity.
In the past few years, many of the monasteries have been lavishly renovated with EU funds, adding plumbing, electricity and new balconies.
The involvement by the European Union has raised questions on how the monks can continue to justify such gender discrimination.
The European Parliament recently passed a resolution that sought to end the ban on women entering the Mount Athos peninsula and various European MPs have even threatened to take the monks to court unless they abandon their stance.
The monks themselves are up in arms and insist that the ban is exceptionally well-grounded legally on Mount Athos' right to self-governance, as well as on the fundamental rights of religious freedom and the protection of property.
Any state intervention would constitute an outright violation of Mount Athos' individual right to choose their manner of worship as well as the monks' rights to allow access to their private property, said a statement issued by the Mount Athos Council.
The Greek government, a firm supporter of the all-male monastic community, maintains that the ban on women's access was incorporated into Greece's EU Accession Treaty in 1981, which outlines the special status of Mount Athos in the European Union.
"From both a legal and spiritual point of view, we should respect states of affairs that have been consolidated over the centuries," said government spokesman Christos Protoppapas.
The monks have also called on the government to take steps to secure the special status of Mount Athos in the European Union so that it can no longer be subjected to such unfair accusations.
"On religious, cultural, ecclesiastical and national grounds, we must safeguard the tradition of 1,000 years as we received it from our fathers," the monks said in a statement.
Mount Athos lies within the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Istanbul, which has been a staunch supporter of civil rights even if they undermine the traditions and principles of the monastic community.
But some members of the Patriarchate believe the monks are too stubborn to ever change.
"In theory, women should be allowed to visit Mount Athos but they [the monks] will never allow it in a million years," said one priest.
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS