The two-lane concrete bridge over a creek on one of Florida's rural state roads has almost no distinguishing feature, except, that is, for its name.
Nigger Jim Hammock Bridge in Hendry County is just one of 144 places throughout the US whose name or an official version of it includes the derogatory term for black people, a term seen as the ultimate, signature word for racism in America.
Many of these names are not widely known to still exist, according to local officials. But they continue to appear on some maps and a database kept by the federal government.
"The vestiges of Jim Crow discrimination throughout the South have some leftover elements. This is just part of that," said Earl Jones, a lawmaker in Greensboro, North Carolina who is sponsoring a bill to change such place names in his state.
"We've still got some cleaning up to do," he said in a telephone interview.
Jim Crow was not a person but a term which affected the lives of millions of people.
Named after a popular 19th century minstrel song that stereotyped African Americans, "Jim Crow" came to personify the system of government-sanctioned racial oppression and segregation in the US.
According to the United States Board of Geographic Names, 35 states have locations whose names include the derogatory word. California, the third-largest state by land area, has 26 such place names, followed by Nevada with 13.
Most of them label bodies of water -- streams, bays, reservoirs, creeks and lakes. Others are summits, valleys, trails or mines. Maryland has an island called Negro Island or Nigger Island in Wicomico County. Washington state has a Nigger Creek in Chelan County, according to the federal database.
In North Carolina, which has seven such sites, a bill which the Senate plans to take up would force counties to register new names with state officials who then will notify the US geography board.
Local legacy
The federal government took steps decades ago to erase the charged term from its use.
The US Board on Geographic Names, responsible for maintaining uniform geographic name usage throughout the federal government, universally changed in its federal database all names using "nigger" to "negro" in 1963 as well as all names using "Jap" to "Japanese" in 1971, according to Roger Payne, the federal board's executive secretary.
But such derogatory names may still exist on state and local maps, resulting in the dually listed "negro" and "nigger" sites in the federal database.
Payne said the database has more than 1,000 references to "negro" but that many, particularly in the US Southwest, may be uses of the Spanish word for black when referring to a geographic feature's appearance rather than to black people.
"Only 144 can be documented as using the pejorative form," he said, referring to "nigger" on maps.
Locally, use of the word in place names has taken much longer to disappear. Geographers and historians attribute that to both remnants of racism and a general opposition to change.
"For a lot of people, they don't see a problem with it. It's been around for ages," said Derek Alderman, geographer with East Carolina University. "They don't question why this feature is named the way it is."
"But I think this is much bigger, goes much further than the feature itself. It's a cultural representation," Alderman said. "Maps are important cultural records. They say a lot about society and about what people value."
Other offences
Some American Indian groups have long tried to get lawmakers to remove "squaw" from location names, arguing that the word is a derogatory term for women.
In the Florida Keys, Jewfish Creek has kept its name despite a petition by a Washington man who argued that it was anti-Semitic. While some efforts to change names have met with limited success, historians and geographers say movements to erase "the `N' word" are altogether less controversial.
"It's the ultimate politically incorrect thing," said David Pilgrim, professor at Ferris State University and director of the Jim Crow Museum in Big Rapids, Michigan.
He said legislation will not stop people now from referring to locations by offensive names, but that over time it may.
"That won't get rid of it in the local lore, in the many towns where people refer to `black bottom' or `niggertown' or `darkietown' in the local lingo," he said of legislation. "But eventually, when you change laws it makes a difference."
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS