The global automotive industry is on the cusp of a new era of competition that is expected to force established manufacturers and new players within the industry to fundamentally rethink their business models. Success or failure is likely to be determined by two key technologies: energy source and artificial intelligence (AI) chips.
First, energy. Whether looked at from the perspective of environmental factors, green energy or efficiency, electric vehicles are to become mainstream during the 21st century. Whether they are to be built around hydrogen fuel cells or use rechargeable or swappable battery cells as their primary source of propulsion is impossible to say for certain, although history tells us that the most advanced technology might not be the one that enters common use.
Whichever power source eventually becomes the universally adopted standard, one thing is certain: Next-generation AI silicon chips will be an integral component of future electric vehicles’ automated driving systems.
An increasing number of vehicles manufactured today have AI smarts hardwired into many of their systems — 360 degree crash proximity collision prevention systems, tire pressure sensors, power detection and GPS navigation all make use of AI silicon chips.
As the development of autonomous vehicles continues, even more demand for vehicle-specific AI chips is to be generated.
Irrespective of local market factors such as regional safety regulations, climate differences in various regions of the globe or a requirement to provide support for nearly 20 years of the chip’s in-service life, high-end automotive AI chips are to be intimately bound to the production of tomorrow’s autonomous vehicles.
Moreover, differences between manufacturers and markets mean that demand for application-specific integrated circuit chips is expected to only increase.
The world’s major suppliers of automotive chips are Infineon Technologies, STMicroelectronics NV and NXP Semiconductors NV.
Partly due to seasonal factors and partly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a massive demand for automotive industry-related electronic products. This has caused serious shortages of automotive chips, and many automobile factories are facing shutdowns as they wait for chips.
The problem is occurring within auto manufacturing hubs from Germany to China, and needs to be resolved quickly.
The severity of the situation motivated German Minister of Economic Affairs and Energy Peter Altmaier to write a letter to his Taiwanese counterpart, Minister of Economic Affairs Wang Mei-hua (王美花), requesting that Taiwan help Germany resolve its chip shortage.
In addition, officials from the US Department of State have held a videoconference with Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs and representatives from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, in which the US asked Taiwan to prioritize chip shipments for US vehicle manufacturers.
With demand far outstripping supply, the shortage in automotive chips could be just a short-term phenomenon. If Taiwanese chipmakers can adjust production capacity, and at the same time obtain an understanding with original design manufacturing chip contractors, the chronic shortage could perhaps be resolved in the short term.
However, as the global automotive industry continues to develop and become increasingly competitive, the shortage could become a long-term problem, with chip demand persistently high. There could even be a situation where competition becomes more intense the more advanced the chips are.
If this came to pass, it would provide a huge opportunity for Taiwanese chipmakers, but also create immense pressure — pressure to fulfill the competing demands of different industries, pressure from different automotive makers and pressure from governments around the world.
With chip manufacturing capacity already maxed out, profits would not necessarily increase by much. Swamped with demand and struggling to cope, Taiwan’s chipmakers would have difficult decisions to make about whose orders to fulfill and whose to decline, offending the ones they have to reject.
When dealing with the situation, Taiwanese officials should remain cognizant of impending threats on the horizon. After all, Taiwanese companies have a monopoly on the production of high-end silicon chips. This will inevitably trigger jealousy and resentment in some quarters, impacting trade and international relations.
Powerful countries might demand that Taiwanese chipmakers relocate factories within their borders and agree to technology transfers. In the worst case scenario, trade retaliation or boycotts could spread to other domestic industries.
Taiwan is neither a big nor powerful country, but the nation’s remarkable achievements in the field of chip fabrication will undoubtedly attract the envy of other nations. Some people have recently suggested that the government should leverage this national asset during negotiations for COVID-19 vaccines — chips for vaccines. It barely needs stating that such a move would be destructive and self-defeating.
San Gee is a professor at National Central University and a fellow of the Asia Pacific Industrial Analysis Association.
Translated by Edward Jones
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS