Since taking power, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has effectively made himself “chairman of everything.” The 2019 novel coronavirus scare (2019-nCoV) is showing all the risks involved with that strategy.
Xi last week took direct control of the response to the outbreak, showing the high stakes in a crisis that has now killed more than 560 people in China and spurred panic across the globe. He has overseen extreme measures, including quarantining more than 50 million people — roughly equivalent to the population of Spain — and rapidly building two new hospitals.
While lower-ranking Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials are starting to admit they were slow to contain the virus, senior leaders very quickly realized the enormous political stakes.
Illustration: Mountain People
On Tuesday last week, they issued a notice calling for cadres to think of the big picture, stay united and “resolutely uphold General Secretary Xi Jinping’s core position” in the party.
If all goes well, with a minimal hit to the world’s second-biggest economy, the benefits of Xi’s model of centralized control would be reinforced.
However, if the epidemic gets worse and the economic pain is deeper than expected, Xi “will deservedly take the blame,” said Scott Kennedy, an expert on the Chinese economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
“There’s no second lieutenant to blame this on,” he said. “And so as goes the virus, so goes Xi Jinping.”
Xi has become China’s most powerful leader since Mao Zedong (毛澤東) in his eight years running the country, engineering constitutional changes to make himself the “core” of the CCP and scrapping presidential term limits. Along the way he has also accumulated a number of enemies, particularly through a corruption purge that resulted in jail time for several senior party officials.
In China’s top-down system of government, much of the political intrigue takes place behind closed doors — stability and control are cherished among top leaders. Worried that they might end up being scapegoats, local officials in the firing line are publicly pointing fingers at each other.
The mayor of Wuhan, the central Chinese city where the virus originated, said he had to wait for “authorization” before he could release information on the outbreak to the public.
The chief epidemiologist of China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the local government failed to recognize the problem from a scientific point of view, and probably had some “executive issues.”
“While no one person may be responsible for the fast spread of the coronavirus, it has resulted in a blame game within the bureaucratic system,” said Zhao Suisheng (趙穗生), executive director of the Center for China-US Cooperation at the University of Denver’s Graduate School of International Studies. “The accelerated spread of the virus is also the result of political incompetence and a tightened control on ideology and information.”
In Xi’s China, lower-level officials must constantly weigh whether they are saying too much or too little.
Since Jan. 24, more than 30 local officials have been dismissed or scheduled for disciplinary review for allowing informal public gatherings, repeating misinformation via official channels and failing to provide superiors with detailed updates, Eurasia Group, a New York-based consultancy, said in a note on Friday last week.
Xi himself has sought to get on top of the crisis, convening what state media dubbed an “unusual” meeting of the Politburo Standing Committee to discuss the outbreak on Jan. 25, the first day of the Lunar New Year festivities.
Similar emergency meetings occurred after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, 2009 street violence in Xinjiang and a 2014 earthquake in Yunnan Province.
The worst may still be yet to come. Even before the outbreak, China’s economy was already slowing amid weak domestic demand, a crackdown on debt and a trade dispute with the US.
The WHO’s move to declare the 2019-nCoV coronavirus a “public health emergency of international concern” sparked fresh concern on Chinese social media about whether small and medium-sized enterprises could survive as countries restricted travel to China.
In a containment scenario — with a severe, but short-lived impact — the virus could take China’s first-quarter GDP growth down to 4.5 percent year-on-year, according to Bloomberg Economics.
That would be a decline of 6 percent from fourth quarter last year and the lowest since it started compiling quarterly data in 1992.
Chief economist Ren Zeping (任澤平) of China Evergrande Group, a Shenzhen-based developer, said on Thursday last week that economic growth this year would slow to 5 percent due to a sharp drop in demand and production, a significant impact on investment, higher short-term unemployment and rising prices.
The report by his team advised the government to provide subsidies for low-income people and “prevent social instability caused by the potential wave of unemployment.”
Disease outbreaks have a history of ending careers of party officials who dutifully sought to work their way up the ranks. In the wake of SARS, which killed 800 people across Asia 17 years ago, China fired more than 100 officials, including the health minister and the mayor of Beijing, amid allegations that the Ministry of Health suppressed information about the disease and local governments botched the response.
Heads have already started to roll this time around.
On Thursday last week, the head of the health commission at Hubei Province’s Huanggang City — which has more than 1,000 people confirmed with coronavirus, the most cases outside of Wuhan — was removed. Hours before the official announcement, local media circulated a video of her struggling to answer when grilled on figures related to the virus.
Another 336 party officials were subsequently punished for incorrectly handling the outbreak, Huanggang Mayor Qiu Lixin (邱麗新) told reporters on Saturday last week.
Earlier in the week, a health official in the coastal city of Tianjin was fired for being “derelict” in fighting the epidemic, the first dismissal over the virus.
Outrage on Chinese social media has shifted from focusing on Wuhan’s government to China’s CDC. Internet users said a paper by researchers from the agency issued on Thursday last week revealed human-to-human transmission — a significant escalation in the pandemic’s severity — had been noticed early last month — earlier than reported.
“I’m out of anger, I don’t know what to say,” Wang Liming (王立銘), a professor at Zhejiang University’s Life Sciences Institute, told his 480,000 followers on SinaWeibo. “This is the first time I’ve seen clear evidence that human-to-human transmission of the new coronavirus has been deliberately withheld.”
His remarks were reposted more than 60,000 times and liked more than 100,000 times before being taken down.
The CDC said in a statement on Friday last week that the paper was based on “retrospective inference” of data from 425 cases, which had already been made public.
Other CCP members have acknowledged some mistakes.
Ma Guoqiang (馬國強), the CCP’s highest-ranking member in Wuhan, told state television that he was full of guilt and regret for not acting faster.
“Because we did not do our work well and failed to make a prompt decision, this resulted in the outbreak being exported domestically and internationally,” Ma said during a China Central Television interview, adding that the government could have closed roads out of Wuhan on Jan. 12.
The crisis has also turned at least one previously little-known CCP member into a social media hero.
Zhang Wenhong (張文宏), a director at the Shanghai Huashan Hospital’s infectious diseases department, received praise online after he pledged to send doctors who are party members to the front lines to relieve non-party members who had been working long shifts fighting the virus.
“I myself will make ward rounds at least one or two times every week,” Zhang told reporters at a briefing in Shanghai on Wednesday last week. “I don’t care why you joined the party, or whether you agree to go to front line, you have to go now without bargaining.”
That kind of appeal to duty should help Xi, as he seeks to rally the party into action. What he does not need is people questioning the overall system, in which all roads lead directly to him at the top.
“Beijing wants to deflect as much of the criticism as they can to local authorities,” Kennedy said. “That helps strengthen the overall system’s legitimacy by saying the main challenge is in implementation, but the main real dominant structure of China’s political system really still emanates from Beijing.”
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
RSS