Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) achieved a near miracle by getting elected Kaohsiung mayor. Despite a 16-year break from politics and being unknown to most Kaohsiung voters, he roundly defeated the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate, who expected an easy victory.
Han shot to stardom, but now that he is trying to climb higher as the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, his popularity has unexpectedly plummeted.
The pan-green camp is convinced that Han’s popularity was a result of Chinese interference. However, Chinese meddling in Taiwan’s elections is nothing new, so why did it only achieve this kind of success with Han?
The truth is that Kaohsiung’s voters rejected the DPP over its poor performance. By the same token, Han himself is the reason for his flagging popularity.
Having started out as a legislator, Han has no administrative experience. What he does have are the bad habits of an elected representative.
There is a big difference between administrative leaders and elected representatives. Administrative officials have great power, but also great responsibility. In contrast, representatives have power without responsibility.
Legislators and city or county councilors can criticize anyone as much as they please without being held accountable. Free speech gives them immunity from prosecution for slander, so no matter what they say about administrative officials, those officials cannot seek legal redress.
Elected representatives enjoy a special status that could lead them to one of two extremes. Studious people could become learned in a legislative environment, because they have the best possible training conditions. It is easy for them to gain the information or guidance they need.
On the other hand, legislators could also easily become degenerates. They could castigate officials as much as they like, but the objects of their criticism cannot retaliate. Even if a councilor or legislator says something wrong, administrative officials are likely to nod in feigned agreement, just to stay on the right side of that representative.
Consequently, even if legislators are thoroughly ignorant, they tend to think that they know it all.
Wise elected representatives use their time in office to train themselves, build a foundation and pave the way to eventually seek an administrative post. The degenerate would not bother, because they think they are already superior.
Han served three terms as a legislator — nine years in total. In that time, he only learned how to look down on everyone and everything. If he had settled down in his job as Kaohsiung mayor, he could have learned to handle the job and become a competent leader.
Instead, even before he had learned how to be a mayor, he set his sights on the presidency. As mayor, he only had to face questioning from a few city councilors, but as a presidential candidate he must answer to every voter in the nation. This is more than he can handle.
Instead of blaming himself for being incompetent, he accuses everyone else of maligning him.
The fawning attitude of administrative officials encourages legislators to become arrogant. In Han’s case, he thinks he alone saved the KMT, and that attitude has offended many KMT elders.
Now that he faces difficulties and is failing to consolidate local factions behind him, those elders are unwilling to help clear these obstacles.
All the problems Han faces arise from the bad habits he acquired during his time as a legislator.
Chen Mao-hsiung is a retired professor of National Sun Yat-sen University and chairman of the Society for the Promotion of Taiwanese Security.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)