On Dec. 12, an explosive device was found next to the offices of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Houbi District (後壁) chapter in Tainan.
Although police resolved the crisis after arresting a suspect on Dec. 14, Japanese international affairs academic Genki Fujii on the same day brought up security concerns for the candidates in next month’s elections at a seminar in Taipei, where he was delivering a speech. These two separate events make it clear that security risks for the upcoming elections are greater than they have been in the past.
During the seminar, which addressed the issue of strengthening the strategic partnership between Japan and Taiwan and was organized by the Formosa Republican Association at National Taiwan University’s College of Social Sciences, Fujii specifically referred to a report by the Chinese-language newspaper Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) about US Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs David Stilwell calling on Beijing not to meddle in Taiwan’s upcoming elections.
Fujii warned that Taiwanese should remain alert ahead of next month’s elections, because China might go to extremes in attempts to interfere and invalidate the elections as the campaign has now entered garbage time since the outcome already seems to have been decided.
This is not the first time that Fujii has voiced such warnings. At a seminar in Tokyo on Dec. 8, he cited the assassination attempt on then-presidential candidate Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) on the eve of the presidential election in 2004 and the shooting of KMT Central Committee member Sean Lien (連勝文) in 2010 when he was campaigning in support of then-Taipei County Councilor Chen Hung-yuan’s (陳鴻源) re-election bid.
The National Security Bureau’s (NSB) Special Service Command Center on Nov. 7 announced the establishment of a security task force comprised of 330 special agents dedicated to protecting presidential and vice presidential candidates. During the unit’s inauguration ceremony, the NSB displayed various kinds of equipment that would be at the disposal of the task force, and the special agents showcased their bajiquan (八極拳) martial art techniques along with their pistol shooting skills.
While the bureau seems to have set up a dragnet to ensure the safety of all candidates, their security is not completely guaranteed, judging from the abundance of aerial footage and pictures taken at campaign rallies staged by every pair of presidential and vice presidential candidates. The neverending supply of such images online, taken by uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAV), is evidence that there are loopholes in the dragnet — the security threat coming from the air.
Assassination by UAV is not a whimsical idea that only appears in movies. During “the INTERPOLITEX 2019 — the 23rd International Homeland Security Exhibition” held in Moscow in late October, the Russian Air Force’s leading military education institution, the Gagarin Air Force Academy, along with UAV manufacturers, proposed the drone swarm attack concept, which they dubbed “Flock-93” and that resembles the plot in the US movie Angel Has Fallen.
The idea of deploying a drone swarm attack with more than 100 drones, each carrying explosives, on targets as far as 153km away highly resembles China’s concept of a swarm assault using commercial off-the-shelf drones, which was reported by Jane’s Defence Weekly back in 2017.
Upon chronological analysis, the Russian UAV design concept likely originates from Russia’s close military exchanges with China, and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army might be more skilled at drone warfare applications.
Although the NSB’s Special Service Command Center is equipped with drone-jamming devices, a few UAV models manufactured by Chinese drone manufacturing giant DJI (大疆創新科技), to cite just one, are operated on frequencies outside the effective range of the drone-jamming devices assigned to Taiwan’s special task force.
In its product specifications, DJI emphasizes the company’s application of frequency-hopping spread spectrum technology, which enables its drones to effectively resist interference.
In terms of the ability to interfere with drones’ satellite-based radio navigation system, known as the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS), the jammers issued to Taiwan’s special task force are designed only to interfere with the US-owned Global Positioning System (GPS), while all models developed by DJI also support Russia’s GLONASS as an alternative to GPS. Designed to interfere with just the US system, the jammers used by Taiwan’s special task force expose another potential security loophole.
The elections next month not only represent the Taiwanese people’s persistence in protecting its democracy, it also represents an important choice about the nation’s future. The safety of all candidates must not be compromised in any way.
Lu Li-shih is a former instructor at the Republic of China Naval Academy and former captain of the ROCS Hsin Chiang.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)