On Nov. 22, the Hsinchu District Court convicted Lo Chi-hsiang (羅吉祥), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) mayor of Hsinchu County’s Jhudong Township (竹東), on charges of vote-buying. It gave him a prison term of three years and 10 months, and deprived him of his civil rights for four years. Upon conviction, Lo was dismissed from office in accordance with the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法).
The Local Government Act (地方制度法) does say that county governments can appoint an acting mayor when a township mayor is suspended or dismissed from office, but the Hsinchu County Government used this power to designate Lo’s wife, Chang Shun-peng (張順朋), as Jhudong’s acting mayor. She took office on Nov. 29.
The county government said it made the move because Chang has considerable leadership and administration experience, is familiar with township affairs and can continue Lo’s policies.
The decision shows the county government’s strong support for a mayor mired in a vote-buying scandal. The county keeps telling everyone to reject vote buying, but it is reaffirming the policy achievements of a mayor who engaged in the practice.
The county’s message seems to be that it does not matter that Lo won his seat by election fraud, and that as long as the county supports him, someone from his circle can become acting mayor. What kind of a legal system produces such a ridiculous result?
The problem is that the Local Government Act only stipulates that “where the mayor of a ... township/city ... is removed from office ... the county government shall appoint an acting mayor.”
The act does allow the local government to exercise administrative discretion when appointing a mayor, but if a law’s implementation can lead to a result as absurd as allowing the spouse of a dismissed mayor to become acting mayor, then the law needs to be reviewed.
The Ministry of the Interior has officially interpreted this power as follows: “For the advancement of local government affairs, when a county government evaluates and appoints an acting mayor, it is advisable for it to assign a person of equivalent rank or who has a sufficient degree of administrative experience.”
The ministry used the language “it is advisable,” rather than “it should,” which is why the county could appoint Chang, although she lacks equivalent rank and administrative experience.
Even a Hsinchu County councilor can only call on the Legislative Yuan to amend the Local Government Act by qualifying such appointments with objective conditions, such as credentials and experience.
Although local powers of self-governance are important, they do no good if allowed to devolve into tools for political parties to consolidate their interests. Attaching objective conditions would be one way to safeguard proper township governance.
Joy Lien is a lawyer and a New Power Party Hsinchu County councilor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)