The Hong Kong protest movement that began with the demonstration against the extradition bill, which was later withdrawn, has continued for half a year.
With the cruel suppression of the protests by the Hong Kong government in cooperation with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), local council elections resulted in a massive win for pro-democracy candidates in a heavy blow to Beijing.
The protesters’ stance that the government must agree to every one of their five demands is strongly supported by Hong Kongers in general.
Over the past 30 years, the CCP, which practices party-state capitalism, has used many unfair trade methods to grow its economy. It is convinced that it is sufficiently strong to complete the “great revival of the Chinese people.”
During this period, it has turned machine guns and tanks on students demonstrating for democracy in Tiananmen Square, and now holds the vast Xinjiang region in its grip, as it did in Tibet.
The party has always believed in the myth that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun, so why are they so riled up by the protests in Hong Kong?
It would only take them 15 minutes to send over the armed police from Guangzhou, and quickly sort out the mess and “maintain stability.”
At the same time, the US-China trade dispute has entered a critical period. US President Donald Trump is taking a carrot-and-stick approach, causing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to hesitate on taking action in Hong Kong, a crucial portal to the West, and to go ahead with Hong Kong’s local elections as planned.
Hong Kongers jumped at this rare opportunity to tell the CCP and the world how they felt, to put an end to Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s (林鄭月娥) arrogance and to give President Xi a slap in the face.
They could accomplish all this by simply lining up to cast their ballot, without gas masks to protect themselves from tear gas and pepper spray, or umbrellas to protect themselves from the water cannons. In a single day, they turned the situation on its head.
The vote is mightier than the sword.
The CCP’s greatest fear is that Chinese learn of the election results in Hong Kong — which could be considered a referendum — and the party has no choice but to suppress the news. Beijing knows all too well that the party-state would collapse if Chinese could vote their conscience.
Hong Kongers have experienced the power of the vote. They will not give up until they are the ones to vote in their legislators and chief executive.
Taiwan, with its many elections, is the envy of Hong Kongers, but will Taiwanese put that right to its best use?
Voters must turn Taiwan into a normal country by blocking red pro-unification forces from infiltrating Taiwan.
Jhang Shih-hsien is a retired National Palace Museum researcher.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS