The Hong Kong protest movement that began with the demonstration against the extradition bill, which was later withdrawn, has continued for half a year.
With the cruel suppression of the protests by the Hong Kong government in cooperation with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), local council elections resulted in a massive win for pro-democracy candidates in a heavy blow to Beijing.
The protesters’ stance that the government must agree to every one of their five demands is strongly supported by Hong Kongers in general.
Over the past 30 years, the CCP, which practices party-state capitalism, has used many unfair trade methods to grow its economy. It is convinced that it is sufficiently strong to complete the “great revival of the Chinese people.”
During this period, it has turned machine guns and tanks on students demonstrating for democracy in Tiananmen Square, and now holds the vast Xinjiang region in its grip, as it did in Tibet.
The party has always believed in the myth that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun, so why are they so riled up by the protests in Hong Kong?
It would only take them 15 minutes to send over the armed police from Guangzhou, and quickly sort out the mess and “maintain stability.”
At the same time, the US-China trade dispute has entered a critical period. US President Donald Trump is taking a carrot-and-stick approach, causing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to hesitate on taking action in Hong Kong, a crucial portal to the West, and to go ahead with Hong Kong’s local elections as planned.
Hong Kongers jumped at this rare opportunity to tell the CCP and the world how they felt, to put an end to Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s (林鄭月娥) arrogance and to give President Xi a slap in the face.
They could accomplish all this by simply lining up to cast their ballot, without gas masks to protect themselves from tear gas and pepper spray, or umbrellas to protect themselves from the water cannons. In a single day, they turned the situation on its head.
The vote is mightier than the sword.
The CCP’s greatest fear is that Chinese learn of the election results in Hong Kong — which could be considered a referendum — and the party has no choice but to suppress the news. Beijing knows all too well that the party-state would collapse if Chinese could vote their conscience.
Hong Kongers have experienced the power of the vote. They will not give up until they are the ones to vote in their legislators and chief executive.
Taiwan, with its many elections, is the envy of Hong Kongers, but will Taiwanese put that right to its best use?
Voters must turn Taiwan into a normal country by blocking red pro-unification forces from infiltrating Taiwan.
Jhang Shih-hsien is a retired National Palace Museum researcher.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
RSS