The Consumers’ Foundation on Monday urged the government to explore alternatives to thermal paper for receipts, which are produced using chemicals that are harmful to the body and make the receipts non-recyclable.
After the government began limiting the use of the compound bisphenol A (BPA), many companies that produce receipt paper substituted it with a structurally similar compound, bisphenol S (BPS).
The issue must not go unheeded by the government, as BPS is known to affect the female reproductive system by disrupting endocrine function and reducing estrogen levels.
In tests conducted by US-based non-profit organization the Environmental Working Group, it was found that cashiers have 30 percent more BPS in their bodies than the average person, making them a particularly high-risk group for reproductive issues.
Tests by the Consumers’ Foundation found that receipts in Taiwan often contain more than 3,000ppm of BPS, well in excess of the 10ppm that is considered acceptable.
The issue is of particular concern in Taiwan because, unlike the US, England and other countries where card payments are common and where people often say “no” to receipts, Taiwan is still a predominantly cash-driven society.
Also, more people in Taiwan take their receipts than consumers elsewhere do, due to the government’s Uniform Invoice Lottery, which incentivizes the behavior to prevent businesses dodging taxes. That means the average Taiwanese not only handles receipts more in the course of an average day, but will handle them again when the government announces the winning numbers. To exacerbate the matter, thermal paper is used to facilitate lining up at post offices, government offices and clinics, and it is used to print admission tickets at some public gyms.
Aside from their effects on health, receipts also have an environmental impact. A report from the Web site Metro published in April on the oil and water needed to produce thermal paper receipts in the UK said that “around 2.5kg [carbon dioxide-equivalent per kilograms] of receipts is generated in carbon emissions — the equivalent of around 21km driven in a car.”
Part of the problem is that thermal paper receipts cannot be recycled, as attempting to do so would release BPA and BPS into the air. They also cannot be composted, as that would contaminate groundwater.
Consumers need receipts, so many countries have been exploring options to replace thermal paper with other options. The most obvious answer would be digital receipts, but the challenge to implementation is a card-payment penetration that remains relatively low — about 30 percent of transactions in Taiwan. Cashiers could also offer to e-mail or text receipts, but the barrier would be reluctance on the part of consumers to hand over personal data.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs could encourage higher adoption of payment cards by subsidizing point-of-sale equipment and transaction costs for retailers, as well as providing free cards to consumers, who currently pay a non-refundable NT$100 deposit for such cards. Another option might be to offer “receipt cards” on which consumers could store receipts digitally, even if they pay with cash. Reusable plastic cards could be provided by the ministry free of charge, with the option of using a smartphone app instead.
The attention that has been focused on disposable plastic straws is good, but thermal paper is just as ubiquitous and must be given more attention because of the harm it can do. In Taiwan, where the effects of a declining birthrate are already being felt, the government must ensure that everyday items like receipts will not be a further hindrance.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS