You have just arrived at the hotel after a delayed flight and a half-hour wrangle with the car-hire firm — and then you remember that you have forgotten to pay last month’s credit card bill, and there will be an interest charge if you wait until you are back at base.
But —- hey —- you can do it online and help is at hand. The receptionist is welcoming and helpful. They have Wi-Fi and it is free.
Relieved, you ask for the password. “Oh, you don’t need one,” he replies. “Just type in your room number and click the box.”
Phew! Problem solved. Er, not necessarily.
At this point the human race divides into two groups. Call them sheep and goats.
Sheep are sweet, trusting folks who like to think well of their fellow humans. Surely that helpful receptionist would not knowingly offer a dangerous service.
Also, they find digital technology baffling and intimidating. And they cannot imagine why anything they do online might be of interest to anyone.
Goats, on the other hand, have nasty, suspicious minds. They believe that many of their fellow humans may be up to something. They believe that, in this networked world, only the paranoid survive.
So when they see an open, free Wi-Fi network they smell a rat. And they would never, ever send confidential information via such a channel.
Sadly, in this particular context, the goats are wiser than the sheep.
They know that hotel chains have become a coveted target of hackers.
Many of the industry’s biggest operators have reported data breaches in recent years, including big names such as Hilton, InterContinental, Marriott and Hyatt.
Most of these attacks, according to Bloomberg, are focused on the property management systems (PMS) used by hotel chains to take reservations, issue room keys and store credit card data.
The Bloomberg report, written by Patrick Clark, was based on the exploits of a team of “white hat” hackers, employed to test the security of a particular system.
After plugging the Internet cable from a bedroom’s smart TV into a laptop they got into the hotel’s PMS, which led to the chain owner’s corporate system.
In doing so they gained access to credit card information for several years’ worth of transactions in dozens of hotels — and if they had been crooks the team could have sold the information on the black market, where a Visa card with a high credit limit can fetch up to US$20.
Why are hotels such tempting targets? Partly because their systems are easy to penetrate, technically.
“Hospitality companies long saw technology as antithetical to the human touch that represented good service. The industry’s admirable habit of promoting from the bottom up means it’s not uncommon to find IT executives who started their careers toting luggage. Former bellboys might understand how a hotel works better than a software engineer, but that doesn’t mean they understand network architecture,” Clark wrote.
The vulnerability is also a reflection of an occupational culture. After all, the hotel business is about welcoming guests and trying to anticipate — and satisfy — their needs.
Nowadays, everybody expects to have free Wi-Fi, so why not give them that in the most hassle-free way imaginable? No messing with passwords and cumbersome log-in procedures; just type in the room number and click “OK.”
From a hacker’s perspective, therefore, the hospitality industry looks like a prime opportunity: easy pickings from hotels’ booking records, plus juicy items of personal information from sheep using insecure Wi-Fi networks.
And it is not just hackers who are attracted to these honeypots, by the way.
The director of any intelligence service that has not been inside the internal systems of Trump’s Washington hotel since his election, for example, ought to be summarily fired for incompetence.
In the meantime, what can traveling holidaymakers do to protect themselves? The short answer is to invest in — and install — virtual private network (VPN) software on any device that travels with you.
A VPN functions as an encrypted tunnel to a special server located somewhere on the Internet.
If you connect to the Observer through a VPN, for example, then the VPN server connects to the paper on your behalf, and because all the traffic is encrypted it is gobbledegook to any snooper, which means that you can safely use hotel (and cafe) Wi-Fi networks wherever you go.
The only downside is that such unlimited protection does not come free, alas, so expect to pay an annual fee. (There are some free services, but they have restrictions on data usage or the number of devices or services you can access.)
TechRadar provides a useful guide to the best VPNs.
Remember that only the paranoid survive. And enjoy the rest of your holiday.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS