An hour’s drive from Mongolia’s capital, Ulan Bator, a lavish monument to national hero Genghis Khan could provide a salutary lesson to the champion wrestler and businessman who built it a decade ago: Mongolian President Battulga Khaltmaa.
Beneath a giant stainless steel statue, portraits of the 13th-century warlord’s successors line the corridors of a museum. Nearly all of them saw their lives cut short during vicious fights for supremacy in medieval Mongolia’s royal courts.
Mongolia is at a political crossroads as public frustration mounts over disputes holding back vital mining and infrastructure projects, and Battulga is preparing for a power struggle.
Since a 1990 revolution, the former Soviet satellite has been regarded as an “oasis of democracy” sandwiched between the authoritarian regimes of Russia and China.
However, power sharing between an elected president and a government appointed by the State Great Khural, Mongolia’s parliament, has left the country in near-permanent deadlock, unable to make progress on major projects, or tackle chronic problems including choking air pollution.
Battulga last year said that Mongolia was incapable of solving what he described as a “systemic crisis.”
He is now trying to change the constitution, raising fears that he is trying to usher in an era of “strongman” politics.
Battulga has said that he is not seeking to erode Mongolia’s 29-year old democracy.
“More than a quarter of a century has passed, but we still haven’t been able to achieve all the expectations we had in 1990,” Battulga told reporters at his office in the parliament building. “What we all know is that change is inevitable. All we need to resolve right now is how to carry it out.”
Mongolians were crying out for a “strong” leader like former Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev or Russian President Vladimir Putin, said Sumati Luvsandendev, head of polling group the Sant Maral Foundation.
However, with parliament likely to resist any erosion of democracy and its role, Battulga would struggle to make changes, he added.
“Battulga is desperately trying to play this role, but definitely he cannot,” Sumati said. “I don’t think that there is anyone in Mongolia to play this role.”
Mongolia’s rich mineral deposits dominate its political discourse. Many citizens have grown increasingly frustrated by the country’s inability to convert resources into concrete gains for anyone but the privileged few.
With polls showing strong support for the public ownership of strategic assets, Mongolia’s mines have long served as political weapons, and Battulga is one of many politicians accused of using suspicions about foreign investment to win votes.
Distrust toward foreign miners was reinforced last year after a military operation to strip Chinese investors of a silver mine in Salkhit in northern Mongolia after they were accused of corrupting local courts.
Attempts to reach the investors were unsuccessful and the site remains under government control.
The government has also been involved in a legal dispute concerning the nationalization of a 49 percent stake in the massive Erdenet copper project, sold to a private company by the Russian government.
With elections looming next year, some politicians are also questioning the benefits of the country’s biggest foreign investment project, the giant Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold project run by Anglo-Australian mining conglomerate Rio Tinto.
A parliamentary working group has made fresh calls to change the terms of the deal behind Oyu Tolgoi, which is 66 percent owned by the Rio Tinto-controlled Turquoise Hill Resources and 34 percent by the Mongolian government.
Some legislators in May said that mine had brought nothing but debt, with Mongolia only scheduled to receive dividends after 2039.
Rio did not respond to requests for comment.
Battulga said that he fully supports foreign firms that comply with local laws, but added that the constitution is clear that strategic assets discovered using Mongolian capital — including the coveted Tavan Tolgoi coal deposit — should remain in Mongolian hands.
Battulga was elected in 2017 on a populist platform, warning about threats from China and Mongolia’s economic dependence on its giant neighbor, earning comparisons along the way to US President Donald Trump.
However, he has been unable to reduce Mongolia’s vulnerability to Chinese pressure.
Shortly after his election victory, a slowdown in customs clearances at the Chinese border created a traffic jam of coal trucks stretching more than 100km, slashing export earnings.
The Chinese General Administration of Customs said that it was upgrading its monitoring equipment, while Battulga did not comment on the issue.
“We are close to two dictatorships and their influence is huge,” opposition Democratic Party leader Erdene Sodnomzundui said, referring to China and Russia. “Neither country likes democracy. It is in their interest to break [Mongolia’s] democratic system. They both want to increase their economic influence over Mongolia as well.”
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that China respected Mongolia’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity, and urged both sides to be on “high alert” against any attempt to disrupt the bilateral relationship.
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond.
Near the dust-blown township of Yaarmag on the outskirts of Ulan Bator, an unpaved road connects dozens of small brick houses to a highway lined with luxury apartment complexes, where well-off Mongolians escape the capital’s asphyxiating winter smog. Nearby is a Porsche dealership.
In ramshackle Yaarmag itself, Battulga’s childhood home, angry residents say that politicians have failed to keep promises.
In a tenement insulated with thick red carpet, Erdenebulgan Badarch, 56, blamed the government for soaring meat prices, high interest rates, poor housing and worsening pollution.
“Nothing has changed for the better,” said Erdenebulgan, whose husband was a classmate of the president. “We had very big expectations when Battulga was elected, but in two years, we haven’t seen anything. It is not about whether he is good or bad, or what he could or should have done, but he is alone.”
A poll released by Sant Maral showed that more than 70 percent of Mongolians would prefer a “strong leader who does not have to bother with the parliament or elections.”
While three-quarters of respondents said that they still supported “democracy,” more than half disapproved of the existing system.
“I think it would be better if we had presidential rule. The other countries with powerful presidents are actually doing better,” local resident Amarzaya Batbayar, 34, said during an anti-government protest in Sukhbaatar Square in late-May.
Ordinary people “have suffered the most from the model we have chosen,” Battulga said, adding that he would seek public approval for any proposed constitutional changes, rather than leave it to parliament to decide.
However, the president is not necessarily going to benefit from any changes.
Constitutional reforms aimed at breaking the deadlock are under discussion, and one option is to turn the presidency into a figurehead and strengthen the position of the prime minister instead, according to a lawyer familiar with the plans.
“Because parliament is in position to control the situation in the country, what we are observing is still the same struggle for power, but in most cases the president is losing,” Sumati said.
At the Genghis museum built by Battulga’s company, Sumati said that the president should take note of how long Mongolia’s old Khans lasted in power.
“It was two or three years, and then they were killed or poisoned,” he said. “There was only one guy who managed to sit on his throne for close to 20 years, but it was a miracle.”
Additional reporting by Munkhchimeg Davaasharav
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS