An hour’s drive from Mongolia’s capital, Ulan Bator, a lavish monument to national hero Genghis Khan could provide a salutary lesson to the champion wrestler and businessman who built it a decade ago: Mongolian President Battulga Khaltmaa.
Beneath a giant stainless steel statue, portraits of the 13th-century warlord’s successors line the corridors of a museum. Nearly all of them saw their lives cut short during vicious fights for supremacy in medieval Mongolia’s royal courts.
Mongolia is at a political crossroads as public frustration mounts over disputes holding back vital mining and infrastructure projects, and Battulga is preparing for a power struggle.
Since a 1990 revolution, the former Soviet satellite has been regarded as an “oasis of democracy” sandwiched between the authoritarian regimes of Russia and China.
However, power sharing between an elected president and a government appointed by the State Great Khural, Mongolia’s parliament, has left the country in near-permanent deadlock, unable to make progress on major projects, or tackle chronic problems including choking air pollution.
Battulga last year said that Mongolia was incapable of solving what he described as a “systemic crisis.”
He is now trying to change the constitution, raising fears that he is trying to usher in an era of “strongman” politics.
Battulga has said that he is not seeking to erode Mongolia’s 29-year old democracy.
“More than a quarter of a century has passed, but we still haven’t been able to achieve all the expectations we had in 1990,” Battulga told reporters at his office in the parliament building. “What we all know is that change is inevitable. All we need to resolve right now is how to carry it out.”
Mongolians were crying out for a “strong” leader like former Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev or Russian President Vladimir Putin, said Sumati Luvsandendev, head of polling group the Sant Maral Foundation.
However, with parliament likely to resist any erosion of democracy and its role, Battulga would struggle to make changes, he added.
“Battulga is desperately trying to play this role, but definitely he cannot,” Sumati said. “I don’t think that there is anyone in Mongolia to play this role.”
Mongolia’s rich mineral deposits dominate its political discourse. Many citizens have grown increasingly frustrated by the country’s inability to convert resources into concrete gains for anyone but the privileged few.
With polls showing strong support for the public ownership of strategic assets, Mongolia’s mines have long served as political weapons, and Battulga is one of many politicians accused of using suspicions about foreign investment to win votes.
Distrust toward foreign miners was reinforced last year after a military operation to strip Chinese investors of a silver mine in Salkhit in northern Mongolia after they were accused of corrupting local courts.
Attempts to reach the investors were unsuccessful and the site remains under government control.
The government has also been involved in a legal dispute concerning the nationalization of a 49 percent stake in the massive Erdenet copper project, sold to a private company by the Russian government.
With elections looming next year, some politicians are also questioning the benefits of the country’s biggest foreign investment project, the giant Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold project run by Anglo-Australian mining conglomerate Rio Tinto.
A parliamentary working group has made fresh calls to change the terms of the deal behind Oyu Tolgoi, which is 66 percent owned by the Rio Tinto-controlled Turquoise Hill Resources and 34 percent by the Mongolian government.
Some legislators in May said that mine had brought nothing but debt, with Mongolia only scheduled to receive dividends after 2039.
Rio did not respond to requests for comment.
Battulga said that he fully supports foreign firms that comply with local laws, but added that the constitution is clear that strategic assets discovered using Mongolian capital — including the coveted Tavan Tolgoi coal deposit — should remain in Mongolian hands.
Battulga was elected in 2017 on a populist platform, warning about threats from China and Mongolia’s economic dependence on its giant neighbor, earning comparisons along the way to US President Donald Trump.
However, he has been unable to reduce Mongolia’s vulnerability to Chinese pressure.
Shortly after his election victory, a slowdown in customs clearances at the Chinese border created a traffic jam of coal trucks stretching more than 100km, slashing export earnings.
The Chinese General Administration of Customs said that it was upgrading its monitoring equipment, while Battulga did not comment on the issue.
“We are close to two dictatorships and their influence is huge,” opposition Democratic Party leader Erdene Sodnomzundui said, referring to China and Russia. “Neither country likes democracy. It is in their interest to break [Mongolia’s] democratic system. They both want to increase their economic influence over Mongolia as well.”
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that China respected Mongolia’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity, and urged both sides to be on “high alert” against any attempt to disrupt the bilateral relationship.
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond.
Near the dust-blown township of Yaarmag on the outskirts of Ulan Bator, an unpaved road connects dozens of small brick houses to a highway lined with luxury apartment complexes, where well-off Mongolians escape the capital’s asphyxiating winter smog. Nearby is a Porsche dealership.
In ramshackle Yaarmag itself, Battulga’s childhood home, angry residents say that politicians have failed to keep promises.
In a tenement insulated with thick red carpet, Erdenebulgan Badarch, 56, blamed the government for soaring meat prices, high interest rates, poor housing and worsening pollution.
“Nothing has changed for the better,” said Erdenebulgan, whose husband was a classmate of the president. “We had very big expectations when Battulga was elected, but in two years, we haven’t seen anything. It is not about whether he is good or bad, or what he could or should have done, but he is alone.”
A poll released by Sant Maral showed that more than 70 percent of Mongolians would prefer a “strong leader who does not have to bother with the parliament or elections.”
While three-quarters of respondents said that they still supported “democracy,” more than half disapproved of the existing system.
“I think it would be better if we had presidential rule. The other countries with powerful presidents are actually doing better,” local resident Amarzaya Batbayar, 34, said during an anti-government protest in Sukhbaatar Square in late-May.
Ordinary people “have suffered the most from the model we have chosen,” Battulga said, adding that he would seek public approval for any proposed constitutional changes, rather than leave it to parliament to decide.
However, the president is not necessarily going to benefit from any changes.
Constitutional reforms aimed at breaking the deadlock are under discussion, and one option is to turn the presidency into a figurehead and strengthen the position of the prime minister instead, according to a lawyer familiar with the plans.
“Because parliament is in position to control the situation in the country, what we are observing is still the same struggle for power, but in most cases the president is losing,” Sumati said.
At the Genghis museum built by Battulga’s company, Sumati said that the president should take note of how long Mongolia’s old Khans lasted in power.
“It was two or three years, and then they were killed or poisoned,” he said. “There was only one guy who managed to sit on his throne for close to 20 years, but it was a miracle.”
Additional reporting by Munkhchimeg Davaasharav
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS