Politico has reported that high-level discussions are under way in Berlin about sending a warship through the Taiwan Strait, following similar US and French excursions that challenged China’s claim to the waterway.
It shows that the German establishment is worried about the US perception of Germany as a less than reliable ally and about France’s transparent ambition to be the EU’s leading military power.
At the same time, the Taiwan plan is clear evidence that Germany does not want to take any risks or invest too much in tackling these issues.
Germany is under constant pressure from the US administration to spend more on defense, but that is a political impossibility while the Social Democrats are part of the governing coalition: They do not recognize NATO’s 2 percent spending pledge as reasonable.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats are more pro-NATO and pro-US — although it would like someone other than US President Donald Trump to be in charge — but their ability to back up those loyalties with action are limited.
One reason is that German voters are consistently opposed to their country’s participation in any overseas conflicts; about three-quarters were against interfering in Syria, for example.
The German concept of a “parliamentary army” — one that only intervenes abroad with the parliament’s permission — makes acting against such formidable majorities problematic. If German troops do go overseas, it is usually on training and support missions. Even in Afghanistan, the only country out of a dozen with German deployments where Germany serves as a lead nation, training Afghan soldiers is the focus of the mission.
Another reason is that the German armed forces face combat readiness problems. Although the Bundeswehr’s inspector general in March reported to parliament that the situation was improving, he admitted that only about 70 percent of the military’s weapons systems were immediately usable and that difficulties remained with submarines and combat aircraft.
Exact numbers of how much of every specific type of military equipment is battle-ready are not being released anymore, which is somewhat suspicious given alarming reports from previous years.
The German navy, too, is not in the best shape. The story of its lead F125 frigate, the Baden-Wuerttemberg, is a good illustration. The warship was first delivered to the navy in 2016, but sent back to the shipyard for numerous fixes. It was delivered anew in late April and should be commissioned this month.
Meanwhile, existing ships suffer from frequent spare-part shortages and long repair times. The navy, like the rest of the Bundeswehr, is short on personnel and it is not heavily engaged in international operations.
The Taiwan Strait looks like an ideal setting in which Germany could show that France, which has been investing heavily in its naval power, is not the only European country with a large, functional military.
In April, a French warship, the frigate Vendemiaire, sailed through the Strait. It was tailed and told to leave by the Chinese navy, but it completed the mission, adding the French voice to that of the US, which has repeatedly sent ships to the area over the past year.
Germany could also demonstrate its loyalty to NATO and US interests; for Germany, the South China Sea is not a strategic priority, so if it shows its flag there, it would be out of solidarity with allies.
At the same time, Germany would not be taking on much risk. Although China always voices strong objections when Western ships pass through the Taiwan Strait, which, along with Taiwan itself, it regards as its own, the probability that a NATO ship would be attacked with deadly force there is low. China has enough on its hands fighting a trade war with the US without adding a military conflict to it. It does not need simultaneous trouble with the EU, either.
Germany has much more of an interest in the safety and sovereignty of Ukraine, a country that aspires to EU membership, than in what happens in the South China Sea. It has an ongoing, though recently neglected, role in mediating Ukraine’s conflict with Russia.
However, Germany would not try to send its warships into the Sea of Azov to help free up Ukrainian ports, which are under pressure from the Russian navy. There, the possibility of a deadly clash would be much higher than in the Taiwan Strait.
Still, even symbolic gestures matter. If a German ship does sail to the Taiwan Strait, Germany’s NATO partners should not dismiss the move as meaningless. Rather, they should see it as a promise that Germany will remain true to its alliances.
Just don’t demand too much of it now.
Leonid Bershidsky is Bloomberg Opinion’s Europe columnist. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion Web site Slon.ru. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
RSS