As I write this from Berlin, I am prostrate before the images of fire, devastation and ash engulfing Notre-Dame de Paris — Our Lady of Paris. She is a treasure of civilization, for those who believe in heaven and for those who do not.
She represents the Europe of beauty, of holy hopes, of greatness and gentility. Like you, like everyone, I am heartbroken.
The tragedy invokes a slew of memories. Victor Hugo’s immortalization of the cathedral in The Hunchback of Notre-Dame of course comes to mind.
So, too, does the verse of Louis Aragon:
“Nothing is as strong, not fire, not lightning,
As my Paris defying danger
Nothing is as beautiful as this Paris of mine.”
One also recalls an opening line from Baudelaire: “I am beautiful, O mortals, like a dream in stone.”
It was not written about Notre-Dame, but it certainly could have been.
The memories extend well beyond the written word.
The cathedral itself has borne witness to centuries of French history, including episodes that are now the stuff of legend. It has stood with France through its mystic knighthood, in its glory and in its gloom.
I think of the mass in celebration of Paris’ liberation in 1944, and of a younger sister’s conversion there. I weep with her, as I weep with all Christians who have had to watch their visible church go up in smoke, the plume perhaps taking a part of their invisible church with it.
The next morning, I think of Notre-Dame as the France of the Resistance. She embodies the Gothic holiness and tranquility of the Seine. She is faith and beauty made manifest, and of course, the words of Hugo and Aragon are still there, dancing in my insomniac head.
I ask myself how I will face the day. How will we face tomorrow?
Hugo supplies the answer: “Time is the architect, but the people are the mason.”
By noon I can only hope that the fire is completely out. For a Parisian, it is torture to see the looped images of the city’s heart being gripped by the violence of the flames.
More than a church has fallen. In a way, Notre-Dame is the soul of humanity itself, and a piece of that humanity has now been scarred.
We Parisians believed our venerable lady to be immortal. Yet there she slumps, wounded and helpless against fate, as were we all while watching the inferno.
However, in the wake of those sorrowful images has come a wave of fellow feeling. Italians, Swedes, Irish, Spaniards, Chinese and Algerians — all have joined in communion with the people of France.
As after an attack, all are saying: “Je suis Paris.”
Finally, in burning, Notre-Dame reminds us of the fragility of our history and heritage, of the precariousness of what we have built, and of the finite nature of millennial Europe, homeland of the arts, to which Notre-Dame is one of the loftiest testaments.
Looking ahead, what are we to think? What should we do?
We must hope that Notre-Dame’s sacrifice awakens slumbering consciences; that, through this disaster, people realize that Europe is Notre-Dame writ large.
More than a political union, it is a great work of art, a brilliant bastion of shared intelligence, but also home to an endangered legacy.
That legacy is too important to lose. We cannot allow pyromaniacs to divide the people of Europe. We must remember that we, together, are builders of temples and palaces, creators of beauty. That is the lesson of Notre-Dame.
French President Emmanuel Macron, who for two years has appealed for unity in rebuilding Europe, is now appealing for unity in rebuilding Notre-Dame.
Together, we must restore the heart of France. We the people are the masons.
Bernard-Henri Levy is one of the founders of the Nouveaux Philosophes (New Philosophers) movement.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)