How long has it been since you saw news about the Belt and Road Initiative? China has not talked about it for half a year, and its Taiwanese cheer squad has also fallen silent.
In August last year, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad announced the termination of his nation’s big East Coast Rail Link contract with China after he was given the cold shoulder during a visit to Beijing.
Two months later on Oct. 4 when the US-China trade dispute was picking up speed, US Vice President Mike Pence delivered a speech on China at the Hudson Institute in Washington. That was when the world finally saw through the expansionist ambition behind the initiative.
China intended to export its overcapacity in the railway, highway and airport sectors while creating a debt trap to hold other countries hostage, all while supporting corrupt, puppet regimes, of which Venezuela is blood-drenched proof.
It remains uncertain to what extent Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has fulfilled his “China dream” since announcing his strategic goal in 2014.
However, his spendthrift policy has caused a domestic backlash, as the widening poverty gap is intensifying the sense of deprivation and planting the seeds of social unrest.
Xi has had no choice but to spend huge amounts of money to stabilize the situation, further intensifying China’s debt crisis.
Knowing that he could not continue, Xi changed his approach. On Feb. 18, the Chinese State Council announced the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area plan, which is to bring together Hong Kong, Macau and nine cities in the Pearl River Delta to an economic zone covering 56,000km2 and 66 million people.
The plan adds to the mirage of China’s economic prosperity, which is created by printing money and flipping property. The combined market value of properties in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangzhou exceeds the value of all property in the US.
Last year, China’s broad money supply, M2, increased by 174 trillion yuan (US$26 trillion at the current exchange rate), more than twice its GDP, and the total market value of its housing market is five times its GDP.
The bubble economy is growing and no one knows how to fix it.
Economics 101 says that printing two dollars to produce something worth one dollar leads to inflation.
However, China uses forceful controls to distort economic laws and directs huge capital flows toward the real-estate market, using it as a reservoir and turning 1.4 billion Chinese into mortgage slaves while the government reaps great financial benefit. As the public’s purchasing power weakens, they have no choice but to become docile, obedient citizens.
Now that the Belt and Road Initiative is broken, China is turning to Hong Kong. Once trapped, the “one country, two systems” framework will be put to sleep and Hong Kongers’ assets will dry up.
Worse still, Hong Kong will lose its century-old reputation for financial freedom as it is sacrificed in the competition between the great powers.
China’s economic volume is 63 percent that of the US, but it issues two times more yuan than the US issues dollars, while the real value of the yuan is anyone’s guess. This is how “red capital” survives.
Late last year, Taiwanese yuan deposits hit nearly 300 billion yuan, but the value of yuan-denominated financial instruments is unclear, something those who fantasize about the currency should consider.
As for Taiwanese businesspeople who have funds trapped in China, all that can be done is to wish them good luck.
Chen Chih-ko is a non-professional investor and a resident of New Taipei City.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS