On Jan. 8, the Chinese government announced regulations that would allow people from Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau to apply for elementary and high-school teaching qualifications after passing Chinese tests. One of the conditions is that the candidate support the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and follow its guiding principles for education.
In response to the changes, Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Chen Ming-chi (陳明祺) on Jan. 11 emphasized that Taiwanese have freedom of movement and the council would not investigate or stop Taiwanese from taking advantage of the rules.
When China launched a policy last year to allow Taiwanese to apply for Chinese residence permits, the council did not respond by proposing strong countermeasures. China has followed up on the policy by allowing Taiwanese teachers to work at Chinese schools.
Surprisingly, not only has the council failed to register its opposition, it has approved of the policy. Is the council playing along with Beijing’s attempts to realize the so-called “1992 consensus”?
While it is true that Taiwanese have freedom of movement, the government still needs to be absolutely clear that China is an enemy.
If a Taiwanese teacher moved to China to work and adhered to the CCP’s policy to “liberate” Taiwan, surely that poses a risk to the nation? If they returned to take the civil servant examinations and work within Taiwan’s state apparatus, surely chaos would ensue if they continued to carry out CCP policy?
The problem with so-called “stray,” or non-tenured, teachers is a longstanding problem in Taiwan. As it is difficult for them to find permanent jobs in Taiwan, they might be forced to “go west” and accept jobs in China. The question is whether this would have a knock-on effect on Taiwan’s education system.
As a former student on a government scholarship at a national normal university in Taiwan, I am well aware that the government has invested a lot to cultivate students such as myself. The goal is to attract first-class talent to work at public schools to help cultivate outstanding students.
However, with China’s teachers’ qualification policy, it is easy to imagine that with Taiwan and China part of the “Sinosphere,” non-tenured teachers working in China might turn into promoters of Taiwan’s “liberation.” That would make Taiwanese teachers in China the best campaigners for the “1992 consensus.”
Is the council aware that this poses a risk?
Koeh Ian-lim is vice chairman of the Taiwan Teachers’ Union.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS