In the past week, the US commemorated US senator John McCain, who passed away on Saturday last week. Many in the US and around the world have spoken eloquently of his courage, principles and passion for justice, freedom and fairness.
It is thus also appropriate to say a few words about what he meant for Taiwan. This is by no means a complete picture, as Taiwanese were only able to witness a few of the moments when he focused on the nation and spoke out on issues of importance to it.
As early as 2005, McCain expressed concern about the Chinese military buildup and supported the inclusion in the US National Defense Authorization Act of a clause “strengthening military ties between Taiwan and the United States by enhancing communication and exchanges between US senior military officials and their counterparts from Taiwan.”
In October 2008 — during his race for the presidency against then-US senator Barack Obama — McCain commented on an arms sale package for Taiwan by then-US president George W. Bush, saying it did not go far enough and should have included submarines and F-16s.
“I believe that America should continue to sell defensive weapons to Taiwan in the future, in accordance with its security requirements, and stand by this remarkable free and democratic people,” McCain said.
In September 2011, McCain joined then-US senators Joe Lieberman, Jim Webb and Mark Kirk to welcome then-presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to Washington.
At a meeting, McCain expressed concern about Chinese interference in Taiwanese elections, and spoke out for free and fair elections, as well as US arms sales to Taiwan.
In early June 2015, McCain hosted Tsai and her delegation in his office in Washington — along with US senators Jack Reed and Dan Sullivan — right after he got off a plane from a long trip to the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore with a stop in Vietnam.
When Tsai was elected in January 2016, McCain was one of the first to send a congratulatory message, saying: “I look forward to working with Dr Tsai to strengthen Taiwan’s democratic institutions and economic prosperity, including through support for Taiwan’s inclusion in future rounds of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. I also look forward to close cooperation on improving Taiwan’s security situation through arms sales and high-end military training that will ensure a stable cross-strait balance.”
Right after Tsai’s inauguration on May 20, 2016, McCain led a delegation of no fewer than seven US senators to Taipei to meet with her.
The US would remain committed to Taiwan’s security, McCain said at the meeting, adding that the visit was intended to reaffirm their commitment to the freedom and independence of Taiwan.
In the US, McCain is being honored as a true American hero: a man who stood for his principles, showed courage under severe duress and who was never afraid to speak up for righteousness and justice.
It is important for Taiwanese to remember him as a close and dear friend of the nation who was committed to supporting security, freedom and democracy.
Gerrit van der Wees is a former Dutch diplomat who served as publisher of Taiwan Communique from 1980 through 2016. He teaches History of Taiwan at George Mason University in Virginia.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS