Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) on Saturday urged the public to give the party another chance in the nine-in-one elections on Nov. 24 to “rebuild a happy and prosperous Taiwan, and a respected Republic of China,” promising the party would strive to achieve an honest government, a robust economy and a harmonious society.
Taiwanese are certainly no misers when it comes to giving politicians a second chance, as long as they can prove they can be responsive to voters’ demands.
However, in view of the party’s response to former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) indictment, it appears the KMT still has a long way to go to convince the public it complies with the principle of accountability and is capable of making moral judgements when it comes to political choices.
Ma on Tuesday last week was charged with breach of trust and breaches of the Securities and Exchange Act (證券交易法) for his alleged involvement in the KMT’s disposal of party assets in 2005 and 2006 when he was KMT chairman, including Central Motion Picture Corp, China Television Co, Broadcasting Corp of China and the former KMT headquarters.
As Ma defended himself against the charges, Wu on Saturday said that all KMT officials believed Ma to be a person of ethics and personal integrity, and the party would collect evidence to support him.
Indeed, in a democratic society under the rule of law, everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Given Ma is a senior KMT member, it is also understandable that his party would want to come to his aid as a show of camaraderie.
However, if Wu and other party officials are leaping to Ma’s defense simply because he is a KMT member and have not studied the indictment, then they are letting emotion cloud their judgement in a grave case that has implications for the party’s greater good.
According to the indictment, which is supplemented with transcripts of recordings provided by witnesses and defendants, as well as statements made by members of the KMT’s top echelon and Central Standing Committee members of the time, Ma stands accused of approving an elaborate, eight-step financial scheme in which the party lost NT$7.3 billion (US$238.8 million) by selling the assets at below market value.
The indictment quoted remarks by Wu, who was KMT secretary-general at the time, expressing concern in 2008 to then-KMT chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) that the sale of Central Motion Picture Corp “might run into problems in the future,” as well as comments by former KMT secretary-general Chan Chun-po (詹春柏) calling the sales “ridiculous” and questioning whether the deal constituted “fraud through engaging in a fictitious trade.”
While it remains to be seen how the case will play out in court, given issues such as whether the court will accept the recordings as evidence and debate over whether Ma had substantial decisionmaking power, as he did not have a managerial position in the companies, among other issues, one thing is certain: The sale of the companies did not go through approval by their respective boards. Regardless, the loss of NT$7.3 billion means the KMT is the victim.
However, instead of assessing the facts for the greater interest of the party, some KMT members have been quick to brand the indictment political persecution against Ma by the Democratic Progressive Party government.
In light of their response, as well as Wu’s remarks on Saturday, it looks like the KMT only has eyes on political gains ahead of the year-end elections. It seems it will not seek the truth about the party’s lost assets, but is interested in only inciting contention between the pan-blue and pan-green camps.
If these are the party’s values on display, it only has itself to blame for people not giving it another chance.
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
RSS