On July 7, two US Arleigh Burke-class destroyers in a high-profile maneuver sailed through the Taiwan Strait from south to north. The announcements by the US and Taiwanese militaries triggered immediate Chinese protest.
This could be interpreted as an indirect three-way dialogue between Taiwan, the US and China. This passage serves the dual purposes of warning the Chinese Communist Party and reassuring Taiwanese.
Few people know that this is a “pattern” that began at the time of the government transition in 2016, because it has not been widely reported.
However, this pattern is different from the situation during the Taiwan Strait Crisis in 1995 and 1996 when the US military sent two aircraft carrier battle groups to the Taiwan Strait, and the two should not be compared.
Sending an aircraft carrier indicates that a situation is being escalated, and even if it is only an exercise, it remains a sensitive issue. This time, destroyers sailed through the Taiwan Strait, deliberately reducing the risk of reigniting US-China tensions.
The last time the “two-ship model” was used was in 2016. In March and June that year, destroyers sailed through the Taiwan Strait. In terms of timing, the passages occurred after the Democratic Progressive Party won the presidential election and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was sworn in. Both passes were low-key and intended as a signal to the People’s Liberation Army to ensure stability in Taiwan during the transfer of political power.
In July last year, the destroyers put in a new appearance. Following celebrations of the handover of Hong Kong to China, the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning sailed through the Taiwan Strait west of the median line between Taiwan and China on its way back to its home port in Qingdao.
Due to the sensitive state of the region, not only did Taiwanese navy vessels monitor the passage from the east side of the median line, but the USS Stethem destroyer also entered the Taiwan Strait and sailed along the median line to monitor it.
In contrast with the above situation, the two destroyers earlier this month were “carrying out a mission of free navigation,” as the US ship told the accompanying Taiwanese ships. This action is obviously intended to reiterate to Beijing that the Taiwan Strait is international waters, not Chinese waters, and passage through it is an established policy that specifically expresses US dissatisfaction with China’s unilateral attempt to change the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.
Reliable sources have said that there was a public announcement this time because it was a deliberate review and amendment by US President Donald Trump and his administration of former US president Barack Obama’s administration’s failure to clearly and effectively address China’s expansion in the South China Sea.
In other words, having learned from its mistakes regarding the South China Sea, US Navy voyages in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea are to become routine, and the reason for these actions should be difficult for China to misjudge.
Since early 2016, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has adopted a repressive strategy to stop official political, military and economic interaction with the Tsai administration. This irrational approach has opened up a lot of room for the US to intervene in the Taiwan Strait, and it is doing so with increasing intensity.
Who exactly is making it legitimate for the US to play the Taiwan card?
Beijing itself.
Tzou Jiing-wen is the editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of
RSS