The Transitional Justice Commission is off to a good start as initial efforts by its members seem to meet public expectations for transitional justice.
The commission is tasked with opening political archives to the public, removing authoritarian symbols, redressing miscarriages of justice and exonerating victims, establishing historical truth, investigating political persecution and promoting social reconciliation, among other duties.
The commission has made progress since its inauguration on May 31 — an encouraging sign given that the Control Yuan was notorious for sitting idly by as paperwork piled up.
Commission member Hua Yih-fen (花亦芬), who is keeping an eye out for remnants of the party-state ideology in education, last month pointed out flaws in the Ministry of Education’s new curriculum guidelines for the 12-year national education system, saying that they displayed signs of a lingering authoritarian mindset and practices.
The commission early last month announced that it aimed to complete the preliminary work for redressing miscarriages of justice within two weeks and it on Wednesday last week said that a review of victims of political persecution during the White Terror era could see more than 13,000 people exonerated.
Commission Deputy Chairman Chang Tien-chin (張天欽) said that the commission’s work to restore justice has “progressed very quickly.”
The commission has also completed drafts for regulations governing the investigation of historical truth about the authoritarian era, which would empower it to open inquiries into historical cases and establish the degree to which perpetrators were responsible for political persecution.
The commission on Sunday said that it is investigating high-profile historical cases, including the death of Carnegie Mellon University associate professor Chen Wen-chen (陳文成) in 1981 under dubious circumstances on the National Taiwan University campus.
Time is of the essence when restoring justice, as many of the victims are at an advanced age, and their children who can give accounts of the tragedies during the White Terror era are also aging.
In view of the progress they have made so far, commission members certainly deserve praise for working hard in a race against time to uncover and correct the misdeeds of the authoritarian era.
Nevertheless, the members can still do more as they investigate and clarify historical truths.
An example is the name “Chinese Taipei,” which is a grave issue related to transitional justice. The so-called “Olympic model” was agreed upon by Taiwan and the International Olympic Committee in 1981, establishing a ridiculous name under which Taiwanese athletes have since been forced to compete in international sports events.
Taiwan was then ruled by the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) single-party regime and people had no say on public affairs.
As Taiwan is a democracy now, practices that relate to party-state ideology should be investigated so that the nation’s athletes can have their dignity restored.
Transitional justice has been long overdue in Taiwan. That the commission has received more than 40 letters of appeal from the public over the past month, according to a source, is testament to this.
“These letters show that the public has high hopes for the commission,” the official said.
Commission members are shouldering a serious responsibility. Hopefully, their hard work will bring tangible results to further consolidate the nation’s democracy.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS