Human rights and North Korean defector groups in South Korea say they are struggling to raise money, cutting jobs and programs, and facing pressure to avoid criticism of Pyongyang as Seoul and Washington focus on diplomatic outreach to the isolated country.
Activists said that they were disappointed, but unsurprised that human rights have seemingly disappeared from the agenda as South Korean and US leaders met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un over the past two months.
“As South and North Korea have promoted this ‘mood for peace,’ the defectors and North Korean human rights activist groups feel excluded,” said Kim Tae-hee, a defector who heads the Coalition for North Korean Refugees.
Illustration: June Hsu
The South Korean government recently closed the office of a human rights foundation and representatives of several non-governmental organizations (NGO) told reporters that they have struggled to secure funding.
Citing a lack of financial backing, as well as recent clashes between police and groups trying to send leaflets into North Korea, Kim Tae-hee said she feels the government is undermining the work of human rights and defector NGOs.
“I feel that an invisible hand is at work,” she said.
The South Korean Ministry of Unification said that its stance remains that it “will strive to comprehensively protect the civil liberties and social rights of the North Korean people.”
A spokesman on Wednesday highlighted efforts to help North Korean defectors settle in the South.
However, South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s administration has moved away from criticism of Pyongyang’s rights record in favor of engagement.
Senior aides to Moon have told reporters that they believe confronting Pyongyang could be counterproductive and possibly harmful to North Korean citizens, who would continue to suffer if their government remains isolated.
UN investigators have reported the use of political prison camps, starvation and executions in North Korea, saying that security chiefs and possibly even Kim Jong-un should face international prosecution.
Between 80,000 and 120,000 people are held in political prison camps, UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Tomas Ojea Quintana said last year.
The North Korean mission at the UN did not respond to requests for comment, but state media have released a steady flow of commentaries this year warning that taking issue with rights violations could undermine the detente.
Even before Moon responded to Kim Jong-un’s overtures in January, there were signs that support for some defectors and human rights activists was waning.
The South Korean government in December last year ended nearly 20 years of funding for the Association of North Korean Defectors, forcing the organization to end most of its programs, move to a smaller office and lay off staff, association secretary-general Seo Jae-pyoung said.
“Only two people... are both working here now,” Seo said. “We have been working unpaid since earlier this year.”
Some South Korean citizens told his group to stop launching propaganda leaflets into North Korea because it would “throw a wet blanket on improving inter-Korean relations,” Seo said.
Officials of the International Coalition to Stop Crimes against Humanity in North Korea (ICNK), which is affiliated with international organizations including Human Rights Watch and Freedom House, said that they have struggled to win new government grants.
“There have been no direct restrictions or notices by the government, as far as I know,” ICNK secretary-general Kwon Eun-kyoung said. “But I feel that there is definitely ambivalence among some working-level government officials and even the press, which does not proactively talk about North Korean human rights.”
Joanna Hosaniak, deputy director general at the Citizen’s Alliance for North Korean Human Rights, said that her organization has also seen donations from South Korean corporations dry up over the past year, amid changes in the domestic and international political climate.
When Thae Yong-ho, a former North Korean diplomat to the UK who defected in 2016, stepped down from his position at a government-affiliated think tank after North Korean media called him “human scum,” some in South Korea saw it as an attempt by the government to distance itself from defectors.
Thae did not respond to a request for comment, but told media at the time that the decision was his own and that he thought it would boost inter-Korean relations.
Just after the summit between Kim Jong-un and US President Donald Trump on June 12, the South Korean government announced that it was ending funding for an office for a new organization called the North Korean Human Rights Foundation.
The foundation was established under the 2016 North Korean Human Rights act to lay “the legal and institutional foundation for protection of human rights in North Korea,” but has yet to become fully operational.
While the unification ministry has said that it is still working to get the foundation up and running, critics said that the delays highlight the administration’s lack of commitment to addressing human rights abuses.
“I am worried that the South Korean government is tiptoeing around North Korea amidst the mood for dialogue, being careful about the issue of human rights,” right-wing South Korean lawmaker Hong Il-pyo said.
Without the foundation, other aspects of the law, including funding for projects, could be more difficult to implement, Lawyers for Human Rights and Unification of Korea head Kim Tae-hoon said.
“This was one of the cornerstones of the North Korean Human Rights act,” he said.
North Korean state media have called for Seoul to repeal the act and abolish the foundation, as they are only “good for doing harm in light of the current trends of the North-South relationship.”
The position of South Korean ambassador-at-large on North Korean human rights, meanwhile, has been empty for nearly 10 months.
“This role enabled us to form a community to work closely with other North Korean human rights activists and experts,” said Yonsei University professor Lee Jung-hoon, who held the ambassador role until September last year.
“Nobody is against the dialogue with North Korea,” he said. “But I hope that there will be discussions beyond nuclear and security issues. Human rights are a very, very important component of a real peaceful endgame for the Korean Peninsula.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing