A sign of the increasing cooperation between Taiwanese military and defense officials and their US counterparts was the presence of two senior Taiwanese officers at the change of command ceremony for the US Pacific Command in Hawaii on Wednesday.
A sign of the continued sensitivity of such ties was that the government has not publicly identified the pair, although Administrative Deputy Minister of Defense Lieutenant General Shen Yi-ming (沈一鳴) was seen in a live stream of the event on the command’s Facebook page, and Chinese-language media reports have said that Chief of General Staff Admiral Lee Hsi-ming (李喜明) was the other.
The ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam was to mark the handover of the command from Admiral Harry Harris to Admiral Phil Davidson, and Harris’ retirement from the US Navy. Harris has been nominated by US President Donald Trump to be the next US ambassador to South Korea.
US Secretary of Defense James Mattis announced at the ceremony that the command has been formally renamed the US Indo-Pacific Command in recognition of the “increasing connectivity of the Indian and Pacific Oceans,” adding that it is the US’ “primary combatant command.”
In their speeches, Harris and Davidson emphasized that the command’s mission was to ensure security and stability “from the coast of Africa to the coast of California and all points between,” a US Department of Defense news release said.
The two members of Taiwan’s top brass were part of a large international contingent that included representatives from Canada, Japan, Australia, the UK, the Philippines, Thailand and at least six more Asian nations.
Chinese representatives might not have been on hand, but Beijing’s military ambitions were mentioned by Davidson, who reaffirmed the US’ commitment to ensure freedom of the seas and skies, echoing comments his boss made the day before.
Mattis had told reporters en route to Honolulu that the US would continue to confront Beijing’s militarization of the artificial islands it has built atop several reefs in the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島), because it has not kept its promise not to put weapons on those islands. Those actions led the US last week to rescind its invitation to China to take part in the Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC), held every two years in June and July near Hawaii.
Mattis added that “only one country” appears bothered by the US Navy’s exercise of freedom of navigation in accordance with international law. He did not give a name, because he did not need to.
Beijing’s South China Sea activities are expected to be among the hotly discussed topics at the three-day Asia Security Summit, which opened in Singapore yesterday with Mattis, his counterparts and defense officials from about 40 nations in attendance.
He is scheduled to give a talk this morning on “US leadership and the challenges of Indo-Pacific security,” while senior officers in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will be among the speakers at afternoon sessions, including one on “managing competition in regional security cooperation” and one on “strategic implications of military capability development in the Asia-Pacific.”
While Beijing sent a low-level delegation to this year’s conference, led by the vice president of the PLA’s Academy of Military Science, it will still be interesting to see the response to their comments.
However, cynics will surely agree that it was no coincidence that a day after the Hawaii ceremony and the eve of the Singapore meeting, Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Ren Guoqiang (任國強) announced that China’s carrier group, led by the Liaoning, had reached “initial” combat readiness after carrying out successful training missions that included system combat capability.
While there has been a lot of focus domestically on whether China’s exclusion from this year’s RIMPAC might increase the odds of Taiwan being asked, the comments made by US officials before and after Wednesday’s ceremony are a reminder that Taiwan is not alone in feeling threatened by China’s aggressive posturing.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS