After months of fevered speculation over the Democratic Progressive Party’s plans for this year’s Taipei mayoral election, the dust might seem to have settled after party headquarters on Wednesday formally nominated DPP Legislator Pasuya Yao (姚文智) as its candidate. However, the decision has raised more questions than answers.
Just a day before the party’s announcement, the Chinese-language Apple Daily had a polling center at Shih Hsin University conduct a survey to gauge public support for independent Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is seeking re-election, Yao and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Ting Shou-chung (丁守中).
The poll found that if the election was just a two-candidate race, Ko would defeat both Ting and Yao, though he would do so more comfortably against Yao (by 32.2 percentage points) than Ting (by 3 percentage points).
However, in a three-legged race, Ting just barely edges Ko, 29.1 percent to 29 percent, while Yao had 13.5 percent, the poll found.
In previous surveys, Ko usually came out ahead whether he faced one challenger or two.
A cross-analysis of the Shih Hsin poll found that nearly 60 percent of respondents who identified themselves as leaning toward the pan-green camp said they supported Yao, while about 34 percent said they would vote for Ko.
It is also worth noting that among respondents aged 20 to 29 — the group the DPP has been trying hard to attract and which has shown the strongest support for the party since the 2014 Sunflower movement — Ko was favored by 55.6 percent, while none supported Yao.
It might make some sense for the DPP to field its own candidate if Ko was heading toward a surefire victory, because it would allow the party to show its unhappiness with Ko and teach him a lesson without giving the KMT back the mayorship.
That would also allow the party to appease the growing number of dissatisfied members like Yao, who were asked to take a backseat in the 2014 election when the party chose to endorse Ko to maximize the pan-green camp’s chance of victory in a traditionally blue-leaning constituency.
However, the stakes are higher now. As the latest poll suggests, if Yao takes the largest share of support from pan-green voters, the DPP campaign for Yao would become a campaign for Ting, because it could erode Ko’s pan-green voter base.
Former DPP legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) — a key member of the DPP’s former New Tide faction — voiced similar concerns on Facebook on Wednesday evening, writing that Ting stands to gain the most from the DPP’s aim of securing a support rating of at least 20 percent for Yao.
So what could happen if Ting really ends up winning?
First, younger voters who support Ko would no doubt blame the DPP and could vote against it in future elections to vent their anger.
Second, Ko could team up with members from the so-called “third force” to run for presidency in 2020, which would undermine President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) re-election bid.
In either scenario, the DPP might end up the loser. The worst part? It could be all it takes to make the KMT’s comeback possible.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS