The Securities and Futures Institute last week announced this year’s corporate governance evaluation results with rankings for all companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange and the Taipei Exchange. Although Taiwan has made progress in corporate governance, more effort is needed to protect the rights and interests of investors, improve how boards of directors function and implement corporate social responsibility.
This is particularly true in the financial industry, as the number of financial companies in the top 5 percent of the annual evaluation has fallen from 11 last year to five this year. King’s Town Bank, China Life Insurance Co, Fubon Financial Holding Co, Cathay Financial Holding Co and E.Sun Financial Holding Co are the only five financial companies out of a total of 43 companies that made the top 5 percent this year, with King’s Town and Cathay Financial being new entries.
Eight financial firms have slipped from the top 5 percent this year, including state-run First Financial Holding Co and Hua Nan Financial Holding Co, because of their poor internal controls in the high-profile scandal involving Ching Fu Shipbuilding Co, as well as state-controlled Chang Hwa Commercial Bank due to a kickback scandal involving two executives at its Dongguan branch in China.
Among the action plans proposed by the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) in its Corporate Governance Roadmap 2018-2020 released in March, are the introduction of corporate governance professionals to support boards of directors by providing necessary information and assistance; the implementation of a candidate nomination system for the election of directors and supervisors; and the promotion of qualitative indicators for corporate governance evaluations.
The FSC likely means well by proposing such ideas to improve how boards are governed and keep them from being reduced to a mere rubber stamp for business owners or major stakeholders.
The proposal to provide corporate governance professionals, for instance, is a sensible move that would help firms avoid potential governance risks by moving toward the separation of ownership and management, especially in family businesses.
Based on the FSC’s proposal, financial institutions such as banks, insurance companies and securities brokerages, as well as listed companies with paid-in capital of NT$10 billion (US$336.5 million) or more, would be from next year required to set up positions for the corporate governance professionals within their organizations. People qualifying for the positions would include lawyers and accountants, as well as managers with legal and financial experience.
Being different from audit and compliance officers, corporate governance professionals would need to have strong integration and coordination abilities to establish an effective corporate governance network fortified by international gatekeepers, such as audit and compliance officers; external supervisors, such as accountants and credit rating agencies; and major stakeholders, including employees and business partners.
Unlike audit and compliance officers, who ensure that companies do not engage in unlawful activities, corporate governance professionals would design and develop a new corporate culture with better governance built into it.
Nonetheless, the FSC still needs to address local businesses’ concerns that the cost of compliance would go up markedly.
The FSC also needs to consider whether the corporate governance professionals should be granted a higher status and have sufficient power to participate in corporate affairs, and most importantly, how they would stand up to pressure from management or controlling shareholders.
Thus far, the FSC has been moving in the right direction, but it should gather more feedback from experts and communicate more with businesses.
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)