I am a great admirer of China and its ability to adjust its economic policies to maintain rapid growth, but now that it has risen to the top of the global economy, it must adopt the necessary reforms to become fully compliant with the international rules that it accepted upon joining the WTO in 2001.
When I first went to China in 1982, it was a very poor nation governed by a thoroughly communist regime. Agriculture was completely collectivized. Because peasants had lost the right to farm their own land, agricultural output was extremely low. Beyond agriculture, individual ownership of the means of production was outlawed. A Chinese family could own a sewing machine for its own use, but it could not own two sewing machines or hire a neighbor to help produce garments.
Under Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), this began to change. Plots of land were returned to their previous owners, who were allowed to keep any output exceeding the government’s quota. As a result, agricultural output soared and farmers produced a range of additional crops, such as flowers and vegetables, to sell directly to the public. Restrictions on ownership of productive assets and on hiring workers were gradually relaxed, such that the private sector now accounts for the majority of economic activity in China.
The result was an explosion of economic growth and a rapid increase in living standards. Since 1982, China’s real (inflation-adjusted) GDP has grown at an average annual rate of more than 7 percent. Per capita real GDP is now 18 times higher, with about 800 million people having been lifted out of poverty since the start of Deng’s reforms. Although overall per capita output in China is still only one-quarter of the US level, the standard of living in China’s major cities is impressively high. To see the gleaming skyscrapers and array of shops serving affluent young people is to appreciate the change that has occurred in just a few decades.
Deng once said: “To get rich is glorious.”
China’s people have responded. Private entities flourish and a very active stock market allows widespread share ownership. China apparently has more self-made billionaires than the US.
The combination of private incentives and effective education is a key reason for China’s rapid growth. The nation has an ancient tradition of promoting the brightest students based on extensive examinations. The officials who worked for the emperors were selected based on written exams of Confucian thought. Now, literacy is universal and national examinations are used to decide who goes to the top universities. More than 1 million Chinese students have studied in the US and several of the top government economic officials have done graduate work there.
In many ways, the Chinese economy now works like a large US multinational corporation. Broad strategy is set by management at the top: growth targets, the structural shift from heavy industry to consumption, the Belt and Road Initiative (which will guide exports and foreign aid) and so on. Individual managers are tried out in regional cities and promoted based on their success in achieving the goals set by national leaders.
The goals set by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the current government are to increase the sophistication of the economy and achieve a middle-class standard of living for the population. To succeed, China is investing large sums in research and technical education.
In its eagerness to catch up to the West, China has also stolen technology from Western firms. Under former US president Barack Obama, the US accused China of engaging in cyberespionage against US firms and stealing their intellectual property. Xi and Obama subsequently signed a communique in 2013 renouncing such cybertheft.
However, China continues to take technology from US companies. It does so by requiring foreign companies that want to do business in China to form joint ventures with Chinese firms, allowing the Chinese partners to obtain US firms’ technology. While the WTO prohibits member countries from conditioning market access on such mandatory technology transfers, the Chinese have responded that nothing is mandatory, because companies do not have to do business in China.
That is clearly disingenuous and the announcement of large US tariffs on Chinese exports is intended to encourage Beijing to comply with the WTO rule on technology transfer.
The Chinese might be getting the message. In an important speech at this year’s Boao Forum, Xi said that China would no longer require such joint ventures in the auto industry — an implicit admission that the requirement is a violation of the WTO rule.
It is time for China to extend this new policy and eliminate the joint-venture requirement completely. Although the US does not have such a requirement, it would be helpful for both countries to state openly that in the future no foreign company will be required to enter a joint venture or to transfer technology in other ways as a condition of doing business.
China can continue its rapid growth and technological development through its own efforts. Its current policy will only lead to a serious trade conflict.
Martin Feldstein is a professor of economics at Harvard University and a board director at the US Council on Foreign Relations.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and