The Executive Yuan on Saturday announced its final nominees for the transitional justice promotion committee, proposing that prominent Taiwanese literature academic Yang Tsui (楊翠), Academia Sinica ethnologist Peng Jen-yu (彭仁郁) and former Taiwan Association for Truth and Reconciliation chief executive Yeh Hung-ling (葉虹靈) fill the remaining three spots on the nine-member committee, which would implement the measures set forth by the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義條例).
Among the nominees subject to legislative review and confirmation, committee chairman Huang Huang-hsiung (黃煌雄) has raised eyebrows among political observers.
Although President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on March 31 said that Huang was an appropriate candidate chosen after rounds of inquiries, and several Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians said he has “public credibility,” Huang is not free of controversy.
Pan Hsin-hsing (潘信行), the director-general of the Taiwan 228 Incident Care Association, has expressed concerns over Huang’s qualifications and called for the establishment of a privately run transitional justice promotion committee to monitor the state-run committee.
New Power Party Executive Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has engaged in heated online exchanges with Presidential Office Deputy Secretary-General Yao Jen-to (姚人多) over the nomination.
Saying that Huang Huang-hsiung during his term as a Control Yuan member opposed the recall of then-prosecutor-general Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) in January 2014 after the latter was convicted of leaking information to then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Huang Kuo-chang raised doubts over Huang Huang-hsiung’s definition of justice.
Yao said that reconciliation is the ultimate goal of carrying out transitional justice, adding: “Huang Huang-hsiung is a good choice if the goal of transitional justice is to achieve reconciliation.”
Yao’s remarks suggest that the government chose Huang Huang-hsiung because he is acceptable to both the pan-green and pan-blue camps, and therefore fits the perception of reconciliation. If this really is the government’s mindset regarding transitional justice, it is disappointing.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has said that the Tsai administration “lacks courage and decisiveness,” and the nomination of Huang Huang-hsiung appears to be an illustration of that.
Implementation of transitional justice cannot be reduced solely to the end result of achieving reconciliation: Without truth and justice, there cannot be true reconciliation.
On Saturday, at an event commemorating the 29th anniversary of the death of democracy activist Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), Tsai said that it is important for the nation to get transitional justice right, adding that transitional justice is rooted in uncovering the truth.
Even Yao acknowledged that the implementation of transitional justice should follow the order of truth-seeking, criminal prosecution, redress and reconciliation.
How will Huang Huang-hsiung convince the public that he is capable of leading the committee when there are allegations that he ingratiated himself with both sides of the political divide?
It is little wonder that 228 Incident expert Chen Tsui-lien (陳翠蓮) reportedly declined a seat on the committee because she believed that Huang Huang-hsiung is not knowledgeable enough about transitional justice to head the committee.
If reconciliation is prioritized ahead of finding the truth, what is the point of setting up the committee in the first place?
Implementing reforms is not easy, but by nominating Huang Huang-hsiung, the government is risking its credibility, as it seems that it has forgotten its pledge to implement transitional justice.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS