There have been reports in the Hong Kong media quoting the Christian community media in China as saying that Chinese e-commerce platforms have stopped selling the Bible. Almost as soon as the story was published, China’s State Council on Tuesday last week issued a white paper entitled “China’s Policy for Safeguarding Freedom of Religious Beliefs.”
The paper said that “it is a principle established in the Chinese constitution that religious groups and affairs should not be subject to the control of foreign forces.”
It also stated that policies guaranteeing religious freedoms should impose safeguards in accordance with the law and “actively guide religions to conform with socialist society.”
The paper also called on religious communities to support the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and uphold the socialist system.
In addition, a rumor spread over the Internet that the Chinese government had decided to completely remove all copies of the Bible from e-commerce sites because it wants to promote an alternative “Chinese version” of the Bible, and that the content of this version has been approved by the CCP and modified to incorporate “Chinese traditional culture” and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era” to produce a “Catholicism with Chinese characteristics.”
This is a crucial time for the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Vatican and China. One of the issues involved in this process is the question of whether or not Beijing will be allowed to interfere with the appointment of bishops in China.
However, the Holy See earlier this year asked Bishop Peter Zhuang Jianjian (莊建堅) of the Shantou Diocese in Guangdong Province to step down in favor of Bishop Joseph Huang Bingzhang (黃炳章), while Bishop Joseph Guo Xijin (郭希錦) of the Mindong Diocese in Fujian Province was asked to step aside for state-appointed Bishop Vincent Zhan Silu (詹思祿) and accept being demoted to auxiliary bishop.
Neither Huang nor Zhan has been ordained by the Holy See.
Following these compromises by the Vatican, the CCP will not only be able to exercise even tighter control over “underground” Catholics, it will also be able to use the global influence of the Catholic Church to its advantage, and expand and raise China’s prestige in the Catholic world.
Earlier this week, there were reports that Guo had “disappeared” the week before, and now there are reports that the Bible has been taken down from e-commerce sites. Perhaps these events mean that the Vatican will stop leaning so strongly toward China.
It is difficult to believe that the Vatican would find it acceptable that Chinese Catholics would have to read a version of the Bible published and annotated by the CCP, and it is even more difficult to believe that the Vatican would allow the Sinicization of the Catholic Church and accept that Catholic bishops serve the CCP.
Chen Kuan-fu is a graduate student in law at National Taipei University.
Translated by Edward Jones and Perry Svensson
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS