After a magnitude 6.0 earthquake struck Hualien on Feb. 6, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe wrote a personal letter to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), stressing that Taiwan and Japan are “old friends” and that “Japan stands ready to provide any necessary assistance to Taiwan at this difficult time.” In addition, Abe also wrote a piece of calligraphy that read, “Taiwan, good luck,” which he posted on his official social media account to express Japan’s condolences and support.
Other countries also joined Japan in expressing their support and condolences to the government.
However, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) did not fail to take advantage of Taiwan’s difficult situation and chose to get in direct touch with Hualien County Commissioner Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) instead of contacting the national government. Zhang “reminded” Fu that, if necessary, China was willing to provide full support and would send a rescue team to Taiwan.
Such a hypocritical display of friendship from China only leaves one with a feeling of disgust, and there are three reasons for these feelings.
First, it was low to intentionally belittle Taiwan’s national sovereignty while it was suffering from a natural disaster.
According to international customs, regards should be paid by the leader of a country to the equivalent counterpart of another country, just as Japan’s prime minister expressed his condolences to Taiwan’s president.
Bypassing the president and the central government by directly getting in touch with local government officials does not express concern about the disaster in Taiwan, but rather about taking advantage of it for political maneuvering.
Second, Zhang should have called for humanitarian consideration rather than talking about the “sentiments of fellow compatriots.”
In the office’s statement, Zhang said that “the people on both sides [of the Taiwan Strait] are one family” and that “blood is thicker than water.”
International rescue missions should be based on human dignity, respect for human life and mutual care. Zhang does not need to make an issue of sharing the sentiments of “fellow compatriots.” Moreover, Taiwan is not a part of China, so Taiwanese are not his “fellow compatriots.”
Third, China used talk of a disaster rescue mission to intentionally throw mud at the Taiwanese government.
In an interview with Chinese-language China Times, Beijing Union University Institute of Taiwan Studies deputy director Li Zhenguang (李振廣) said that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait should focus on rescuing victims of the natural disaster.
He then made a point of adding that, as cross-strait contacts have been suspended, direct contact with local governments in Taiwan is “the only solution when there is no other choice.”
There are communication problems precisely because China does not want to treat Taiwan as a country, and it has unilaterally ceased all official communications and exchanges between the two sides.
China’s actions serve explicit political purposes. It is shameless of China to say that “political issues should be put aside and left behind to be solved at a later date.”
In everything that Beijing does, political concerns are given the first priority, while the rights and interests of those living in China remain the least important. Does it really think that it can clean its dirty hands simply by selecting one person to talk big?
Politicizing a rescue mission and pushing its “united front” strategy, this is how low Beijing is sinking to implement its despicable “rescue politics.”
Chen Chi-nung is the principal of Nantou County’s Shuili Junior High School.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS