He is a reclusive hedge fund billionaire who made a fortune using complicated algorithms to bet on things other people could not see.
One of his gambles was on US President Donald Trump.
His backing of the long-shot presidential candidate has made Robert “Bob” Mercer, the former co-chief executive of Renaissance Technologies, the top powerbroker in Republican politics today.
The Mercer family is not nearly as well-known as the industrialist Koch brothers or the Las Vegas casino magnate Sheldon Adelson when it comes to supporting right-wing causes in the US, and they are more than happy to keep it that way.
Mercer, 71, who worked as a computer scientist at IBM before joining Long Island-based Renaissance Technologies, has always shunned the limelight.
According to numerous accounts, Mercer is socially awkward and intensely private.
He is described in Michael Wolff’s bombshell new book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House as “almost nonverbal, looking at you with a dead stare and either not talking or offering only minimal response.”
Robert Mercer in November abruptly announced that he was stepping down as co-chief executive of Renaissance Technologies because of the unwanted press scrutiny brought about by his political activities.
In his resignation letter, Mercer also made his most expansive public comments to date, outlining the core principles of his libertarian philosophy.
“I believe that individuals are happiest and most fulfilled when they form their own opinions, assume responsibility for their own actions and spend the fruits of their own labor as they see fit,” he said. “This is why I support conservatives, who favor a smaller, less powerful government.”
In his book about the Trump White House, Wolff expanded further on what he said was the Mercer family doctrine.
He said they were attempting to build a “radical free-market, small-government, home-schooling, anti-liberal, gold-standard, pro-death penalty, anti-Muslim, pro-Christian, monetarist, anti-civil-rights political movement in the United States.”
With the silver-haired Mercer patriarch remaining behind the scenes, it is up to Rebekah, 44, the second of his three daughters, to channel the family money to conservative causes and maintain the direct line to the White House.
While the Koch brothers and other Republican mega-donors sat out the 2016 presidential race because of a distaste for Trump, the Mercers threw their considerable resources behind the brash real-estate tycoon after initially backing Texas Senator Ted Cruz.
They donated millions to Trump’s coffers and persuaded his then-floundering campaign to take on board two figures seen as instrumental to his upset victory over former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton — anti-establishment ideologue Steve Bannon and pollster Kellyanne Conway.
Robert Mercer, who reportedly has an abiding hatred of the Clintons, is a long-time patron of Bannon, who headed the right-wing Web site Breitbart News until becoming chief executive of Trump’s election campaign.
When Trump angrily severed ties with Bannon over comments he made in Wolff’s book, it was a damaging blow to his former White House chief strategist.
However, the coup de grace to Bannon’s any remaining political ambitions might have had came a few days later, when the Mercer family pulled the plug on their long-time ally.
“I support President Trump and the platform upon which he was elected,” Rebekah Mercer said in a rare public statement. “My family and I have not communicated with Steve Bannon in many months and have provided no financial support to his political agenda, nor do we support his recent actions and statements.”
The excommunication marked the end of the long-standing collaboration between the Mercer family and Bannon, who had been a fringe player in Republican politics until a US$10 million investment by the Mercers turned Breitbart News into a powerful conservative voice.
The Mercers are estimated to have contributed a total of more than US$100 million to conservative causes over the past decade, including funding for the Government Accountability Institute.
Rebekah Mercer serves as chairwoman of the board of the Florida-based institute cofounded by Bannon, whose stated mission is to root out “cronyism and corruption.”
The institute is perhaps best known for a 2015 book by its president, Peter Schweizer, that was highly critical of the Clintons: Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.
Besides contributing to Breitbart and the institute, the Mercers also invested in Cambridge Analytica, a political data analysis firm whose efforts have been credited with helping Trump win the 2016 election.
While Bannon has for years been the Mercers’ frontman for their political activities, his departure from the scene would not appear to lessen their influence.
According to the Daily Beast, before repudiating Bannon, Rebekah Mercer held a telephone call with the White House, where she spoke with Trump.
The 75th anniversary summit of NATO was held in Washington from Tuesday to Thursday last week. Its main focus was the reinvigoration and revitalization of NATO, along with its expansion. The shadow of domestic electoral politics could not be avoided. The focus was on whether US President Biden would deliver his speech at the NATO summit cogently. Biden’s fitness to run in the next US presidential election in November was under assessment. NATO is acquiring more coherence and teeth. These were perhaps more evident than Biden’s future. The link to the Biden candidacy is critical for NATO. If Biden loses
Shortly after Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) stepped down as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2012, his successor, Xi Jinping (習近平), articulated the “Chinese Dream,” which aims to rejuvenate the nation and restore its historical glory. While defense analysts and media often focus on China’s potential conflict with Taiwan, achieving “rejuvenation” would require Beijing to engage in at least six different conflicts with at least eight countries. These include territories ranging from the South China Sea and East China Sea to Inner Asia, the Himalayas and lands lost to Russia. Conflicts would involve Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia,
The Sino-Indian border dispute remains one of the most complex and enduring border issues in the world. Unlike China’s borders with Russia and Vietnam, which have seen conflicts, but eventually led to settled agreements, the border with India, particularly the region of Arunachal Pradesh, remains a point of contention. This op-ed explores the historical and geopolitical nuances that contribute to this unresolved border dispute. The crux of the Sino-Indian border dispute lies in the differing interpretations of historical boundaries. The McMahon Line, established by the 1914 Simla Convention, was accepted by British India and Tibet, but never recognized by China, which
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)