To coincide with the government’s new minimum wage standards that took effect on Jan. 1 — with the hourly rate rising to NT$140 and the monthly minimum increasing to NT$22,000 — several enterprises have announced their own pay raises. According to a survey released by an online job bank last week, 40.2 percent of companies this year plan to hand out raises of 4.09 percent on average, both the highest figures in three years.
However, Taiwanese will not be satisfied with the pace of government wage hikes if they compare them with those in South Korea. South Korea’s minimum wage this year is to see its highest increase in 17 years to 7,530 won (US$7.13) per hour, which is the equivalent of about NT$210 per hour and 50 percent more than Taiwan’s. Certainly, there are mixed views in South Korea regarding its huge minimum wage hike, but there is no doubt that it is the envy of many Taiwanese.
Even with Taiwan’s average economic growth registering 2.7 percent annually over the past 10 years, wage levels each year have only increased by about 1.5 percent on average, far more sluggish than economists and policymakers expected.
The small portion of national GDP growth shared with employees has been an important factor leading to the nation’s stagnant wages.
Business profits accounted for about 30 percent of Taiwan’s GDP prior to 1990, and gradually climbed to reach 35 percent in 2016, data provided by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics showed.
However, in the meantime, the part of the nation’s GDP allocated to employee salaries — dubbed the “labor share” by the International Labour Organization — declined after 1995, falling to a low of 43.8 percent in 2010. It was 43.81 percent in 2016.
There are many ways to respond when people ask why the nation has not seen more wage growth, but the big questions are whether companies could share their profits with their employees and whether they are willing to do so.
It seems that companies have tended to be more generous with shareholders than with employees, which explains why many employees do not amass any savings even though they work hard.
Apart from hapless attempts to morally persuade employers, the government said it would provide incentives to businesses with good salary structures, but what the incentives will be remains unclear. Discussions about stagnant wages have been going on for years. People need to see concrete measures set out by government agencies to address this problem.
While the political environment makes it hard to advance more progressive measures, there is one issue that should gain bipartisan support: keeping the economy growing on a broad basis.
This would allow local businesses to upgrade and give the nation’s economic structure, which is in a painful transition period, a chance to transform itself. Local businesses must move toward high-value-added business models. Creating added value in both manufacturing and service-oriented industries and improving labor productivity could spread wage gains throughout society.
During this period, the government needs to curb industrial relocation and attract new business investment. It must propose measures to help those who might be displaced by technological innovation and change in the business environment.
The government should also implement more stringent enforcement and heavier punishments for labor law violations, as the bargaining power of employees is weak because of low union membership.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS