During an interview with the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper), Tu Tze-chen (杜紫宸), former head of the Industrial Technology Research Institute’s Knowledge-based Economy and Competitiveness Center, touched upon the topic of air pollution.
He said that the government could consider restarting the second generator of the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City, as it was not originally taken offline due to an accident or because of safety concerns and still has five-and-a-half years to go before its designated lifespan expires.
He also said that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) was perfectly safe and that by extending its lifespan it would be possible to burn less coal, thereby reducing pollution.
However, 30 minutes after the conclusion of major maintenance on the Guosheng plant’s second generator on May 16 last year, an explosion occurred in the lightning arrester box, an accident that only came to public attention several days later, when a worker at the plant leaked the news via a legislator.
How can we say there are no safety concerns when equipment explodes so soon after major maintenance work at a nuclear power plant? Since the time of the explosion, we have done without the second generator for two summers. Why risk restarting it now?
There are even larger safety concerns over the Ma-anshan plant, which was built in a place where a nuclear power plant should never have been built: on an active tectonic fault.
Fires have broken out at the plant on numerous occasions. In 1985, a turbine blade failure led to a fire and hydrogen leakage; in 2001 a fire broke out when the emergency diesel generator trains failed to start due to problems caused by salt-bearing seasonal sea smog; water intrusion into the high-pressure “bushing” sleeve caused another fire in 2009; in 2015 an auxiliary step-down transformer caught fire; and deterioration of the generator’s insulation caused yet another fire last year.
It is not just fires, either: In 2015 stud bolts jammed in the reactor lid, the control rod drive shaft warped, the steam generator bolts cracked and a bolt shot out and injured a contractor. In October last year, bolts once again jammed.
Last year brought more accidents: In January, a cooler sprang free, causing the generator to shut down; in March, coolant leakage led to an upsurge in radiation; in May, a control rod guide tube fell off and became bent; in June, the exhaust pipes of the main turbine’s condenser cracked; and in July, deterioration of the motor cable insulation caused an emergency shutdown of the unit.
The plant has been plagued by problems and should be decommissioned immediately.
According to Article 95 of the Electricity Act (電業法), power-generating facilities that use nuclear energy are to wholly stop running by 2025. The operating license for the second generator of the Ma-anshan plant expires in May of that year. Extending its lifespan would be against the law.
Nuclear power produces highly polluting nuclear waste. This, coupled with the risk of nuclear disaster, means that it cannot be considered a clean source of energy.
Once the improvements to the Linkou coal-fired power plant in New Taipei City have been completed, the amount of coal used to generate a unit of electricity will have been reduced by 15 percent and greenhouse gas emissions will have fallen by approximately 20 percent. The improvements came after Taiwan Power promised to invest to improve air quality and the efficiency of “green” facilities.
CPC is now also considering to turn its gas stations into “green” energy stations, charging electric cars using renewable sources of energy and reducing mobile sources of air pollution. It is also considering restarting research into geothermal energy from Datunshan.
Continuing to consider restarting the generators at the Guosheng and Ma-anshan plants does more than show a lack of risk awareness: It also risks forgoing the opportunity to develop other sustainable sources of energy.
Tsai Ya-ying is a lawyer affiliated with the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The Paris Olympics are over and the five-ringed views of the Louvre, Invalides, Eiffel and Versailles just memories. As a diplomatic historian, my thoughts naturally turn to France! The Olympian of world affairs, the creators of “diplomacy,” Cardinal Richelieu and Prince Talleyrand. But sixty years ago, at the 1964 diplomatic games, Team China bested Team France in a battle of wits in “free-style negotiations” over Taiwan. Paris never recovered. To be fair, in Europe of 1963-1964, France was besieged. She had been ousted from her Asian dominions. She had begun her first nuclear weapons tests just as the United States and
Having the title doctor or the letters PhD after your name carries the connotation of having broad knowledge. In reality, while people with doctoral degrees often possess highly specialized expertise and might be held in high esteem among their peers, they are likely virtually unknown to the general public. In Taiwan, people with doctorates are common, while probably fewer than one out of 100 of them could truly make a name for themselves. Of course, there are exceptions. Those who gain media exposure can easily become well-known, especially if they are involved in politics. However, many fail to live up to
For the past few weeks, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) have been embroiled in a series of scandals related to irregularities in their presidential campaign financial reporting. These scandals continue to expand as more evidence surfaces, raising more questions about the party’s financial propriety and competency. These irregularities include unusually high spending, allegedly accepting donations from abroad, reporting 97.3 percent of personal donations as “cash,” making large payments to marketing firms with close ties to the party and accounting errors. When the financial irregularities were first reported, the party blamed it on “arbitrary misconduct” by
Over the past few years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a visible change in the EU’s approach to Taiwan. I call this phenomenon European hype about Taiwan. The change is noticeable at both the EU and member-state levels, with parliaments and Central Europe leading the way. The best example is the fact that Taiwan is finally mentioned in various EU documents (a real novelty compared with the past 30 years), in addition to statements by European politicians, an increase in bilateral contacts, a growing awareness of Taiwan’s importance and its contribution not only to European prosperity, but