A public opinion poll conducted in May showed that Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) approval rating, at 44.6 percent, was the lowest out of the heads of Taiwan’s six special municipalities, but in the latest poll, taken after the enthralling Taipei Summer Universiade, his approval rating easily surpassed 70 percent.
There have even been calls for him to stand in the next presidential election. It just shows how easily public opinion can change.
However, the signs of blind idolatry are worrisome.
Just as criticism makes good people better and bad people worse, a great city is marked by a relentless scrutiny of its politicians. How difficult can it be to dispense with superficial quibbling and deal with issues head-on?
There is no need to find fault for its own sake or to let emotions rule over common sense. All that is needed is careful, cool and rational thinking.
At the Universiade, Taiwan won more medals than Taiwanese had dreamed possible — 26 golds, 34 silvers and 30 bronzes — placing it third among the 134 countries that took part.
Its placing is an incontrovertible fact, as is the fact that not one of those gold, silver or bronze medals was won through Ko’s personal talents.
Ko was not the coach or trainer of any medal winner, nor a family member, who quietly supported an athlete over years of training.
To put it bluntly, what on earth do all those medals have to do with Ko?
When Kuo Hsing-chun (郭婞淳) broke a world record in women’s weightlifting, did Ko help her lift even one kilogram out of the 142?
When Cheng Chao-tsun (鄭兆村) broke the Asian javelin record set at the 2014 Asian Games, the javelin he threw had not been paid for out of Ko’s own pocket, nor was it supplied by the Taipei City Government. It had been loaned to Cheng by Japanese javelin thrower Kenji Ogura.
Tai Tzu-ying (戴資穎), the world’s top-ranked women’s badminton player, gave up the opportunity to compete in the Badminton World Federation World Championships, in which she could have won up to 12,000 ranking points as well as NT$3 million (US$99,980) in prize money from the government’s National Honor Prize program.
Instead, she chose to compete in the Universiade hosted by so-called “Chinese Taipei.” What was her motivation? Was she inspired by Ko’s magnificent statement that “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family”?
As she said after her Universiade win, she competed because “showing Taiwan to the world is a beautiful thing” and “as a Taiwanese, to support this competition and strive and struggle along with everyone, staying here was the right thing to do.”
As head of the Universiade’s host authority, Ko’s performance should be judged by how well or badly his administration ran the Games, not by the number of medals won by Taiwanese competitors.
Let us consider it from the athletes’ point of view.
Were the competition schedules or venues defective in any way? Did the food and accommodation at the Athletes’ Village make the athletes feel welcome? Did the transportation arrangements work? Was order kept among the spectators so that nothing disrupted or affected the flow of the Games? Were the judges fair and did they handle complaints in a way that everyone could accept?
These are the things that mattered to the competitors and their staff.
Now let us look at it from the host’s point of view.
Considering that it cost NT$20 billion from the nation’s coffers to host the Games, did they provide the world a clearer view of Taiwan and promote the nation?
What about the disruption by protesters opposed to pension reform at the opening ceremony, blocking athletes from entering the stadium on time? Should Ko and his administration be held responsible for that?
Is it not a fact that the tennis courts became so hot that players nearly fainted? Who is to blame for that?
When 23 million Taiwanese total a score for Ko’s performance, are these not the factors that they should judge him by?
As for taking the glory won by our athletes through years of grueling effort, why should it be shared with Ko, who did not lift a finger?
Taiwan could do without such blind worship. After all, it might go to Ko’s head — and it obscures the sportsmanship, which comes from years of sweat and tears, behind the medal count.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under