Taiwan has been given several doses of confidence in international rankings about its level of freedom. The improved performance might have allowed the people and leaders of the nation to celebrate World Press Freedom Day on Wednesday, but has the nation really become freer?
On July 15, the country is to mark the 30th anniversary of the lifting of martial law, which lasted from May 1949 to July 1987 and is, thus far, the longest period of martial law the world has seen.
During that dark period, thousands of Taiwanese were jailed, tortured, made to disappear or executed for saying or printing things that displeased dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and later his son. People that escaped state violence understandably remained silent out of fear for their personal safety.
Taiwan’s civic and political freedom has surged since the end of martial law, the subsequent lifting of newspaper limitations in 1988 and the 1992 revision of Article 100 of the Criminal Code, which originally provided the legal basis for the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government to restrict freedom of expression.
There has been an avalanche of news outlets and political talk shows critical of the government. Reports compiled by international watchdogs have also taken an optimistic view on the development of the nation’s democracy and human rights.
In February, news about Taiwan outperforming several of its Western and Asian partners, such as the US, France and South Korea, in Washington-based Freedom House’s latest Freedom in the World report made front pages. Taipei also saw a rise in its overall score from 89 out of 100 last year to 91 this year.
Last month, Reporters Without Borders announced its choice of Taipei over Hong Kong for its first office in Asia, citing concerns about Chinese threats to the territory’s press freedom
A few weeks later, the Paris-based media watchdog published its World Press Freedom Index, which moved Taiwan’s ranking up six places to 45 out of 180 nations, making it home to the freest media environment in Asia.
The outlook seems optimistic if only the most recent international ratings are considered. It might be less bright looking further back or at the bigger picture.
In April 2008, just a month before former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was inaugurated, Taiwan jumped to its highest ranking in Freedom House’s Freedom of the Press report since 2004, at 32nd.
However, Ma’s China-centric policy significantly increased Taiwan’s economic dependence on China, prompting many media outlets that lacked sufficient financial backing to self-censor and tone down criticism of Beijing to attract advertisements.
China-friendly Taiwanese businesspeople’s increasing control of news media has sped up a worrying trend in the nation’s media freedom.
As a result, Taiwan’s media freedom rating in the 2009 Freedom House report plunged to 43rd, and it was ranked 47th and 48th for years until it climbed back up to the 44th position last year and to 39th this year.
Several high-profile figures have voiced concern about self-censorship, including then-Freedom House president Mark Lagon in February last year, in an interview with the Taipei Times and its sister paper, the Chinese-language Liberty Times.
Unfortunately, the problem is still there and might get worse as the Chinese government carries on with its carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwanese corporations, businesspeople and media outlets, and as it becomes increasingly hard for news publications to stay afloat.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under