Earlier this month, Pxmart Co Ltd president Hsu Chung-jen (徐重仁) commented on the issue of low wages among Taiwan’s young people and accused them of spending more money than other age groups, triggering a strong backlash online.
Some people said Hsu lacked sympathy for young Taiwanese and their way of life, while others said he seemed to have the mindset of a demanding boss who is only good at pointing fingers at others.
Aware of the potential consequences of such a backlash to his business, the retail veteran later posted an apology on Facebook, saying that he should not pass judgement too quickly on the younger generation and that he had decided to speak less and listen more.
Regardless of whether Hsu should make an apology over his personal opinion and whether his observation was wrong, the matter has sparked further discussion among the public about the problems of stagnant wage growth and widening inequality in the nation.
Discussions about low wages and the wealth gap have been going on for many years. Policymakers from both major parties have repeatedly vowed to use all available resources to address these problems. However, apart from hapless attempts to morally persuade Taiwan’s employers, the government has done little to alleviate people’s concerns.
Data about median wages in the nation’s industrial and service sectors released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) late last month showed that the situation is worsening.
The overall median wage last year declined 0.6 percent from a year earlier to NT$40,612 per month, which means that about half of the nation’s employees earned less than NT$40,000 per month. As the median wage for last year was lower than the average wage of NT$48,790 and the gap between the two figures widened from NT$6,026 in 2009 to NT$7,673 in 2015 and to NT$8,178 last year, it is clear that income inequality is growing.
The ratio of median to average wages last year dropped to 83.24 percent from 84.25 percent the previous year, the lowest level since the 2008 global financial crisis. This is another sign that the distribution is skewed toward low wages.
The DGBAS last week pointed to the relocation of local manufacturers to other nations as the main cause of low wages. As the high-paying manufacturing base is shrinking, while the number of low-paying retail and food service jobs is rapidly increasing, it is hardly surprising that wage level growth has nearly stalled over the past 16 years, the DGBAS said.
However, the problem of low wages involves a complicated set of factors and the DGBAS’ reasoning only relates to changes in the nation’s economic structure and social development in the past two decades.
The problems could originate from businesses’ legitimate concerns over taxes, environmental rules, labor competitiveness and other cost issues, but to some extent, it could also be blamed on corporations’ greed and selfishness, exploitation in the workplace or distortions in the labor market.
The government has failed to put enough pressure on businesses for too long.
The nation’s flawed political mechanism is a cause for concern, slowing down policymaking, limiting the scope and effectiveness of relevant policies and making scant progress in fostering an environment where companies have better access to investment funds and can stay profitable — and willing to offer higher pay.
We often hear people say that it will take some time to transform the nation’s economic structure and upgrade its industrial sector, but nothing will happen unless all of us get down to work.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when