Taiwan has yet to know whether it will be invited to attend this year’s World Health Assembly (WHA) in Geneva, Switzerland, next month. Whether or not Taiwan is invited, if it wants to connect with the international community and play a role in international health issues, it needs to keep in touch with global health trends and understand the main issues of concern to the WHO.
The theme for this year’s WHA is “Advancing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Building Better Systems for Health,” and it will explore how to strengthen systems for promoting health in countries at different levels of social and economic development.
In 2015, the UN General Assembly approved a declaration titled “Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” along with 17 sustainable development goals that set priorities for the world until 2030. The agenda stresses common development in three aspects — environmental, economic and social — and the WHO is leveraging this agenda by calling for health to be seen as a core issue to achieve these goals.
To achieve these sustainable development goals, the report of January’s session of the WHO’s executive board proposes several strategies for reform.
First, it calls for a shift from “health governance” to “governance for health.” This means not just integrating work and resources within healthcare departments, but also making other departments protect and promote health. For example, tackling air pollution involves construction, the environment and health.
Second, the WHO calls for strengthening healthcare systems to achieve universal health coverage as essential for development.
Investment in public health might not be as visible and glamorous as industrial development, but health infrastructure is an important pillar supporting the functioning of a country.
The WHO has also noticed the opportunities brought by innovations in information and communication technology. In the age of big data, analysis, application and management of data is essential to strengthening healthcare systems.
Taiwan has repeatedly been shut out of the international community because of political concerns. Indignant as one might feel about this, promoting Taiwan’s participation in the WHO requires more than just political action. It also calls for laying a firm foundation by making contributions to technological expertise.
The National Health Insurance program that benefits people in Taiwan is founded on well-functioning financial and health systems. However, many problems have cropped up in the course of running the program. Given that Taiwan has already achieved universal health coverage, its experience with health finance and data systems, and the challenges it has faced with these systems, can enrich the discussion about “moving toward governance for health.”
Taiwan’s innovative health cloud service and PharmaCloud system, its experience in interdepartmental cooperation on the tobacco surcharge and tax and its experience in detection and control of counterfeit medicines all correspond to the WHO’s areas of concern. They are issues that can enhance Taiwan’s practical participation and ways in which it can meaningfully contribute.
Taiwan has built up copious health databases and statistical data that can be used in coordination with sustainable development goal indices. It could keep in step with international data by offering a Taiwanese version of the WHO’s World Health Statistics reports. Such measures would strengthen Taiwan’s meaningful participation and resonate with globally relevant issues.
Lin Shih-chia is executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan and a former legislator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS