Many Taiwanese were indignant when a group of former military officers in November last year attended an event in Beijing, where they listened to a policy address by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in which he warned against Taiwanese “separatism.”
The group was made up of seven retired generals, 12 former lieutenant generals and 18 retired major generals. The group were seen standing at attention and singing the People’s Republic of China’s national anthem along with Chinese political and military officials. The Veterans Affairs Council at the time reminded retired military personnel that they should not attend official events held by the Chinese government, while Premier Lin Chuan (林全) threatened to cancel the pensions of retired civil servants and military personnel who participate in political activities in China.
However, just how determined the Cabinet is to curb such conduct among military personnel remains to be seen.
Media reports regarding proposed amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) are telling. Last week, reports said that the Executive Yuan was considering fining members of the group between NT$10,000 and NT$50,000 each, but an Executive Yuan official said that this was only one example of the punishment the Cabinet was considering.
The Executive Yuan yesterday proposed a fine of between NT$10,000 and NT$50,000 (US$318 and US$1,591) for retired military personnel who do not apply for permission to visit China and a fine of NT$200,000 to NT$2 million for those who “engage in Chinese Communist Party political events and behave in ways that damage our national dignity,” rather than cuts to pensions or other retirement benefits, media reports said.
Although these reports were denied by Executive Yuan spokesman Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇), who said the amendments are among various proposals being discussed, the scale of possible punitive measures are indicative of the Cabinet’s seemingly lenient stance on the matter.
While a fine of up to NT$2 million might sound like a lot to average Taiwanese, such an amount is disproportionate to how much classified information military personnel have access to during their careers. The fines are hardly a deterrent for those who are eager to take part in political activities in China and shake hands with Chinese Communist Party officials; if anything, a fine of NT$2 million might play into the hands of Beijing, which would certainly be willing to pay a fine as a “favor” to an informant.
How is the government to reinforce military ethics and loyalty when such punitive measures make light of conduct by retired military officials in China?
A Taiwan Thinktank survey last month found that 73.8 percent of respondents think it is inappropriate for former military officials to engage in political activities in China, while 73.9 percent said they support the establishment of regulations for retired military officials visiting China.
The Cabinet is certainly unfit to trumpet the importance of national security if its proposed amendments will let retired military officials who engage in inappropriate events in China off the hook so easily. Hopefully the Cabinet does not fall short of public expectations.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS