Beijing tends to say that statements critical of China “hurt the feelings of Chinese.” It has also been openly claiming that it is trying to win the “hearts and minds” of Taiwanese.
However, after its recent moves aimed at forcing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration to recognize the so-called “1992 consensus,” Beijing has not only hurt the feelings of Taiwanese and failed to win over their hearts, but also pushed Taiwanese further away from itself.
Beijing’s attempts to dominate Taiwan became more blatant after Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the DPP won the presidential election on Jan. 16. The ever-growing list of oppression includes an incident in April when a Taiwanese delegation was requested to leave an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development conference in Brussels due to Chinese pressure; the belittlement of Taiwan at the WHO through an invitation to the World Health Assembly meeting in May referring to UN Resolution 2758 and the “one China” principle, with Beijing interpreting that as the People’s Republic of China encompassing Taiwan; the deportation of Taiwanese on suspicion of telecommunications fraud from Kenya to China; and Taiwanese officials participating in a meeting of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization’s Committee on Fisheries (COFI) in Italy in July being forced to leave the venue allegedly due to Chinese pressure.
There was also bullying by China at the Rio de Janeiro Paralympic Games this month, when members of Taiwan’s team had to change the badges on their uniforms, because China said the emblem with the 12-point sun in a circle is the emblem of the Republic of China.
And lastly, Beijing’s objection is believed to be why Taiwan was not invited to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) assembly this week in Canada.
While Beijing might give itself a pat on the back, thinking it has stepped up pressure on the Tsai administration, the outcome of its obstructionism might disappoint Chinese officials.
China’s openly hostile stance toward Taiwan and its efforts to push Taiwan out of the international community further upsets Taiwanese and causes them to view Beijing with more repulsion.
Each time Beijing behaves in a belligerent and unfriendly way toward Taiwan, it repels Taiwanese further.
Beijing’s scheming to prevent Taiwan attending the ICAO’s triennial assembly highlights what the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration trumpeted as its diplomatic achievement three years ago, when Taiwan was invited as a special guest of then-ICAO council president Roberto Kobeh Gonzalez and took part in the 2013 ICAO assembly. It was more of a victory for Beijing, as Taiwan’s participation was arranged between the ICAO and China under the “one China” principle, with Taiwan being regarded as a province of China.
The way China has been treating Taiwan lately contradicts its “charm offensive” of the past eight years, aimed at winning the hearts and minds of Taiwanese.
Rather than finding the key to winning over the hearts of Taiwanese, Beijing — as a result of its incessant bullying and attempts to limit Taiwan’s international space — has worked to propel Taiwanese to stand in unity in their growing feeling of disgust with China.
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
A retired elementary-school teacher surnamed Lai (賴) said that, after retiring at the age of 50, he earned a monthly pension of over NT$60,000. Since retirement, he has earned over NT$10 million (US$306,457). If the government does not allocate more funding, the pension funds would soon go bankrupt. There is an urgent need for reform. If his monthly pension were lowered to NT$50,000, it would still be enough to cover basic life expenses, he said. In response, Taipei School Education Union president Lee Hui-lan (李惠蘭) said to Lai: “What do you mean by using your own pension as an example?”
RSS