Since the presidential election in January, Beijing has reportedly been reducing the number of Chinese visitors to Taiwan. This has sparked a mixed reaction, with pessimists expressing concern over reduced tourism revenues and weakened economic ties with China, while optimists view it as the push Taiwan needs for an economic transformation.
For the latter, it is an opportunity for the nation to diversify and improve its tourism industry to attract more foreign visitors. What should Taiwan do?
Before proceeding to consider potential overseas markets, it would be helpful to look at some statistics. In Taiwan, Chinese tourists are often negatively perceived. While some criticisms are justified, a majority of them stems from differences in political ideologies.
For instance, it is generally believed that Chinese tourists spend less money on shopping than their Japanese counterparts. This might be correct for now, but things might change as the Chinese economy grows and more independent tourists come to Taiwan.
A walk along the east coast would confirm that since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office, the number of Chinese tourists have slumped. From Hualien County’s Guangfu (光復), Ruisuei (瑞穗) and Yuli (玉里) townships to Taitung County’s Guanshan (關山) and Chihshang (池上) townships and Taitung city, restaurants, hotels, shops and tour bus operators have been complaining about declining business.
When asked to comment on the government’s plans to attract more tourists from Southeast Asia, the typical response is that markets in Southeast Asia are generally 10 years behind Taiwan and the cultural differences and language barriers pose long-term challenges.
How should Taiwan respond to the shrinking number of Chinese tourists? If the transition of power in Taiwan has indeed prompted Beijing to abort policies that benefit Taiwan, the nation must respond by turning the crisis into an opportunity.
First, Chinese investors own large shares in major corporations in Taiwan, including travel agencies, hotels, shops, tour bus operators and amusement parks. While their widespread presence has a lot to do with their political and economic ambitions, the declining number of Chinese tourists could cause significant losses to their businesses.
Considering that many of the investors are closely affiliated with powerful government officials, Beijing should soon allow more tourists to visit Taiwan.
Second, how can Taiwan change the nation’s tourism culture and instill aesthetics and a sense of beauty into everyday life? Over the past few years, there have been significant improvements in the facilities and amenities at tourist sites, notably at train stations and public restrooms. However, these are only the first steps. The government must build major transportation networks, including expanding the high-speed rail, subway systems and YouBike services to help tourists travel easily.
There should also be variety in accommodation options, from star-rated hotels to cozy bed-and-breakfasts.
Finally, it is essential to explore new markets in Southeast Asia, as well as Europe and the US. Cultural differences might be an obstacle, but things might begin to change in a few years, as Southeast Asian immigrants in Taiwan bring about further cultural exchanges.
Southeast Asia is a big market with a large population. It is likely that Taiwan could find a niche market for its tourism industry. Of course, it is also important that Taiwanese show they are hospitable and friendly.
After all, looking down at your customer while trying to sell them goods never works.
Wu Yi-Yen is an associate professor in Tungnan University’s tourism department.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS