Since the presidential election in January, Beijing has reportedly been reducing the number of Chinese visitors to Taiwan. This has sparked a mixed reaction, with pessimists expressing concern over reduced tourism revenues and weakened economic ties with China, while optimists view it as the push Taiwan needs for an economic transformation.
For the latter, it is an opportunity for the nation to diversify and improve its tourism industry to attract more foreign visitors. What should Taiwan do?
Before proceeding to consider potential overseas markets, it would be helpful to look at some statistics. In Taiwan, Chinese tourists are often negatively perceived. While some criticisms are justified, a majority of them stems from differences in political ideologies.
For instance, it is generally believed that Chinese tourists spend less money on shopping than their Japanese counterparts. This might be correct for now, but things might change as the Chinese economy grows and more independent tourists come to Taiwan.
A walk along the east coast would confirm that since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office, the number of Chinese tourists have slumped. From Hualien County’s Guangfu (光復), Ruisuei (瑞穗) and Yuli (玉里) townships to Taitung County’s Guanshan (關山) and Chihshang (池上) townships and Taitung city, restaurants, hotels, shops and tour bus operators have been complaining about declining business.
When asked to comment on the government’s plans to attract more tourists from Southeast Asia, the typical response is that markets in Southeast Asia are generally 10 years behind Taiwan and the cultural differences and language barriers pose long-term challenges.
How should Taiwan respond to the shrinking number of Chinese tourists? If the transition of power in Taiwan has indeed prompted Beijing to abort policies that benefit Taiwan, the nation must respond by turning the crisis into an opportunity.
First, Chinese investors own large shares in major corporations in Taiwan, including travel agencies, hotels, shops, tour bus operators and amusement parks. While their widespread presence has a lot to do with their political and economic ambitions, the declining number of Chinese tourists could cause significant losses to their businesses.
Considering that many of the investors are closely affiliated with powerful government officials, Beijing should soon allow more tourists to visit Taiwan.
Second, how can Taiwan change the nation’s tourism culture and instill aesthetics and a sense of beauty into everyday life? Over the past few years, there have been significant improvements in the facilities and amenities at tourist sites, notably at train stations and public restrooms. However, these are only the first steps. The government must build major transportation networks, including expanding the high-speed rail, subway systems and YouBike services to help tourists travel easily.
There should also be variety in accommodation options, from star-rated hotels to cozy bed-and-breakfasts.
Finally, it is essential to explore new markets in Southeast Asia, as well as Europe and the US. Cultural differences might be an obstacle, but things might begin to change in a few years, as Southeast Asian immigrants in Taiwan bring about further cultural exchanges.
Southeast Asia is a big market with a large population. It is likely that Taiwan could find a niche market for its tourism industry. Of course, it is also important that Taiwanese show they are hospitable and friendly.
After all, looking down at your customer while trying to sell them goods never works.
Wu Yi-Yen is an associate professor in Tungnan University’s tourism department.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
RSS