Imagine two neighboring countries, let us call them “Country A” and “Country B” for the sake of simplicity. Country A is big and strong, with a long history of constant warfare and chaos, which has resulted in some of its politicians being aggressive, cunning and greedy. Country B is a small, weak country with a short history and an innocent and naive population. Some of its politicians are ignorant, selfish scoundrels, comparable to those of Country A.
Country A is guilty of the same thing as many other big nations: It bullies smaller and weaker nations, has great territorial ambitions and wants to annex its smaller neighbors.
Country B is close to Country A and is at the receiving end of most of its actions. It would be easy for Country A to invade Country B, but fearing that unprovoked military attack would result in a backlash from the international community, sanctions and perhaps even conflict, it restricts itself to propaganda, threats and inducements in its attempts to make Country B surrender.
However, the results are not what it wants. It changes tack to rely on its financial might to pay Country B’s immoral politicians, babbling academics, greedy businesspeople and unethical military officers to form groups that are close to Country A, and call on the people of Country B to throw themselves into its embrace.
It is just that the people of Country B happen to like their free way of life and are fearful of being ruled by Country A and losing the freedom they have fought so hard for.
Country A is in a rush and unwilling to wait, and so it plots with the groups friendly to it in an attempt to make Country B launch an unprovoked attack on it and give it a legitimate excuse to claim self defense in a fierce “counterattack” that leaves half of Country B in ruins and thoroughly destroys its fighting morale, leaving it without either the capability or the will to resist.
Country B’s military firing a big cannon requires a set of complicated procedures, but the conspirators remove them, one by one, until only the final step remains: using one finger to press a button and fire away. To do that, they find a lowly soldier, not too smart, show him how to press the button and tell him to stand by.
It just so happens that the leader of Country B is abroad on a diplomatic visit, which offers an excellent opportunity for implementing the plot. Everything is in place, the lowly soldier is on stand-by over his launch button and all the other officers have cleared the deck to be able to present an alibi later they were not present.
A simple order is issued, the lowly soldier presses the button with the finger he was taught to use, the cannon really does fire and the lowly soldier is elated. The conspirators cover their ears and hold their breaths as they wait for Country A’s mighty “counterattack.”
However, the missile does not live up to expectations: It never reaches Country A. Instead, it hits a house in Country B and kills and injures some of its own people. In disarray, the conspirators realize that their plan has failed. They hurriedly discuss how to clean up the mess and agree that the launch should be presented as a “mistake.” They then make a big fuss as they rush to punish the lowly soldier and a few unfortunate officers, hurrying to close the case in the hope that everyone will forget about it.
A great ingenious plot comes to a tragi-comic ending.
Lessons learned: Traitors are dangerous and must be stopped, and evil plots are difficult to bring to a successful end, so it is better to abstain.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS