There have been reports that a majority of Taiwanese want the nation to join the UN, regardless of what the US and China might think.
According to the same reports, people are also dissatisfied with Taiwan’s international status. The constant threats and pressure from China is certainly the main reason for this, but the “non-normality” of Taiwan itself is another important factor.
If Taiwan itself is not normal, its international status cannot improve, even without China blocking it. Taiwan would remain an international aberration even if it continued to console itself, collectively talking about being sovereign and independent. It cannot even define its territory, so why the talk about sovereignty?
The most “non-normal” thing about Taiwan is that after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was chased out of China, it ruled the nation for about 70 years. Relying on a metaphysical slogan — “one China, different interpretations” — it claimed that its territory included the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and other members of the UN.
Taiwanese’s feelings of identity and territory have been destroyed by the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda and the KMT’s brainwashing, and their common sense has been so numbed that they no longer think that there is anything strange about the KMT’s delusional territorial claims.
The first step toward Taiwan’s normalization must be to accept that the surreal and delusional territorial claims are tantamount to recognizing that the nation has no defined territory.
It is like the way someone who says “wherever I lay my hat is my home” has, in fact, no home. A place without a defined territory cannot be a nation and it cannot receive international recognition.
Taiwanese have been deceived and living in an illusory state of pretense for far too long. It is time to come down and step on solid ground and prove that Taiwanese no longer believe in the absurd, exaggerated delusion and pragmatically, humbly and rationally announce to the world that Taiwan’s territory is restricted to Taiwan proper and the Penghu Archipelago. As for the status of Kinmen and Matsu, that would require further discussion.
The size of the area is similar that of the Netherlands and the population is greater than in three-quarters of UN nations. The educational level, social development and industrial potential is superior to more than half the world’s nations.
Due to Chinese obstruction, Taiwan has been unable to join the UN as an equal member of the international community.
The world must be made aware of this great humiliation and injustice. China might be strong, but innumerable challenges to its survival exist, and the consensus among the international community in general and the US, Japan and the EU in particular is that they will no longer accept military attacks by dictatorships or authoritarian governments on democratic and free nations.
If Taiwanese continue to work hard to improve and consolidate democracy and develop the nation’s industry, it is just a matter of time before things change. When that happens, there will be a wave of recognition of Taiwan.
Based on a foundation of reality, the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should build a national consensus behind the creation of a new constitution or the amendment of the current one.
If the government is unable to take the first step, Taiwanese can forget about normalizing the nation.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser
Translated by Perry Svensson
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS