Tsai faces tough calls
Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will soon be inaugurated as the next president of the Republic of China (ROC). Tsai will enter office facing a number of very difficult challenges, arguably the most critical being a slowing global economy, Taiwan’s over-dependence on the sharply contracting and financially over-extended Chinese economy, the contingent environmental and economic impacts of anthropogenic global warming, and pressure from the Chinese government to maintain the cross-strait policies of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
It already appears that Tsai will be busy maintaining discipline among members of her government. Rash, embarrassing and damaging comments by minister-designates have indicated that the pattern of members of the Cabinet evincing foot-in-mouth disease is sadly likely to continue regardless of how hard Tsai and her premier work to maintain a professional and effective administration that does not carelessly squander public support in senseless acts of self-defenestration.
In terms of Taiwan-China relations, the elephant in the room, namely China’s unceasing aggression, blackmail and bribery of Taiwanese as archaic policy reaction to Taiwan’s clear and unambiguous existence as a full sovereign nation appears to finally be more visible to the wider international community.
China’s expansionism and adventurism in the South China Sea has exposed the falsehood of its claims to peaceful development in the region.
Furthermore, its conditional united front “detente” with the Ma administration, and sudden switch to hostility and tensions after Tsai was elected, has illustrated how peaceful cross-strait relations are not inherently valuable for Chinese nationalists on either side of the Taiwan Strait if they exist for any reason except as a mechanism for facilitating China’s annexation of Taiwan.
The recent invitation from the WHA for “Chinese Taipei’s” participation as an observer at its annual meeting is a good example of the kind of Hobson’s choice that Tsai is likely to routinely face over the next four years largely as a result of Ma’s counter-productive legacy.
On this occasion, it appears that the US and the EU worked hard to lobby the WHO/WHA secretariat to send an invitation to Taiwan to continue its annual participation, something that is to be welcomed.
China obviously worked hard to include “conditions” which underscored that the invitation was made in line with its interpretation of the “one China” principle.
It should be remembered that the 1971 UN Resolution 2758 and the 1972 WHA resolution 25.1 only state that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) replaces the “representatives of Chiang Kai-shek” (蔣介石) as the only legitimate representatives of China to the UN and its administrative bodies. Neither “Taiwan” nor even the “Republic of China” were mentioned. It is purely China’s interpretation that both were assumed by the UN to be incorporated within the PRC since 1971, a “fact” that neither the UN, the US, nor the EU formally recognizes.
Tsai’s decision for the ROC to attend the WHA and make a statement of protest, is probably the best course of action. She will face pressure from within her party for her response to such a difficult decision, but the responsibility for Taiwan’s diminishment in this case, if any, lies more with the Ma administration and with WHO Secretary-General Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍) than with Tsai or the Democratic Progressive Party.
The US and EU should publicly praise Tsai for putting the health and welfare of Taiwanese first, and pressure the WHO and WHA to clarify that the unilateral 2005 memorandum of understanding stating Taiwan as a “Province of China” has no legal or administrative weight or influence in the organization.
Ben Goren
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS