After Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) announced that the Taipei City Government would push for the dissolution of the city’s contract with Farglory Group (遠雄集團) for the Taipei Dome complex, the future of the project has become the focus of media and public attention.
This is an analysis of the injustice created by the dome space from the perspective of spatial justice and a suggestion for how to return spatial justice from the perspective of corrective justice.
Spatial justice can be examined by looking at whether the process through which a space was created was in line with distributive and procedural justice. Distributive justice involves the equality, difference, fairness and efficiency principles, while procedural justice stresses procedural fairness and administrative neutrality.
The equality principle demands that individuals and groups be treated equally. The site of the project was once home to the Songshan Tobacco Factory, a social resource. As the site of the Taipei Dome and a shopping mall, the area cannot be used for a park, public housing or other public use.
In Abraham Maslow’s “hierarchy of needs” theory, watching baseball is categorized as a higher-order need, as opposed to a fundamental one. Giving priority to allocate social resources to satisfy higher-order needs is a violation of the equality principle.
The difference principle demands that the long-term expectations of the least advantaged group should be maximized. Using the site of the Songshan Tobacco Factory for the Taipei Dome makes no contribution to those at the bottom of society, which means that the project violates the difference principle.
The fairness principle is a “deserts principle,” according to which benefits that people deserve must be proportionate to what they contribute. In this case, the Taipei City Government made excessive concessions to allow the investor to obtain high profits that it does not deserve, which means that the project violates the desert principle.
The efficiency principle demands that distribution should not be made at the cost of certain people’s losses. Since the dome project could harm the environment, local neighborhoods, historical remains and public safety, it is a violation to the efficiency principle.
Procedural justice emphasizes procedural fairness and administrative neutrality in the distribution of resources, so it is obvious that the project violates procedural justice.
The production of the Taipei Dome space clearly violates the principles of justice. As Ko plans to dissolve the contract with the investor, he should seriously think how to correct the mistake and remedy the losses from the perspective of corrective justice. Otherwise, the contract’s dissolution might result in even greater losses.
That the creation of the Taipei Dome is unjust, perhaps Ko should terminate the contract by claiming that a breach of contract is caused by damages attributable to the other party. He should announce that the city would not buy the construction and demand that the other party remove it within a specified period of time. Violations attributable to the contractor are a serious delay in schedule, failure to follow the construction plan and unresolved public safety problems.
After the contract’s termination, the Taipei City Government can keep the office buildings and the hotel on the site, and raise funds to pay for the contract’s termination through selling superficies rights to the property.
As for the dome, the movie theaters, the shopping mall and other buildings on the site, they could be replaced by a park after their demolition.
Yang Chung-hsin is a retired research fellow of Academia Sinica’s Institute of Economics.
Translated by Eddy Chang
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama