Last month, as President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was visiting Guatemala and Belize, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) announced that it was establishing diplomatic ties with the Gambia, which was previously one of Taiwan’s few diplomatic allies.
Ma has said that since he came to office in 2008, the PRC has maintained a “diplomatic truce” with the Republic of China (ROC) as a gesture of goodwill.
Why did China have a change of heart in the last months of Ma’s Beijing-friendly administration?
Some analysts said that it was a “warning” to president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who is to be sworn in on May 20 after her landslide victory in the Jan. 16 elections.
They said that if she does not adhere to the so-called “1992 consensus” and follow the “one China” principle, then Beijing would start poaching Taiwan’s diplomatic allies.
Young Taiwanese feel strongly about the nation’s international recognition and think that it should be accepted as a full and equal member of the international community.
However, would they lose sleep over the severing of ties with the Gambia? Not really. Not because it is a small African nation with an undemocratic government that in 2013 decided to break ties with Taiwan, but because people need to focus on what is really important for the nation, as it faces an existential threat from across the Taiwan Strait.
Taiwanese need to focus on two things: First, building a better, more free and democratic nation that would set an example for other nations in the region. Taiwan needs to have better, more transparent politics; not “black box” operations favored by Ma. It needs an accountable Legislative Yuan, not shady back-room dealings that are characteristic of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Second, Taiwan needs to improve its relations with other nations that share its democratic values.
The nation’s diplomatic ties are the legacy of a bygone era when the then-KMT government claimed to be the ruler of all of China, hence the ROC name.
Officially, the nation retains this name, but it is a matter of time before it disappears to make way for “Taiwan.” The world refers to Taiwan as “Taiwan” and young people of the nation consider themselves “Taiwanese.” This is the reality on the ground and the sooner people adapt to it, the better.
Young Taiwanese reject the international isolation imposed on the nation due to the legacy of the KMT, which came from China with Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) after World War II. Taiwan deserves a place in the international community and the PRC’s claims are as unfounded, unjust and unfair as the KMT’s old claims to rule all of China.
It is time to leave the Chinese Civil War behind and work toward a new, positive and constructive relationship across the Taiwan Strait, in which the two nations recognize each other as friendly neighbors. That is the only way they could have sustainable peace and security in the region.
As far as the Gambia and other allies are concerned: Taiwanese would welcome it if they would move toward dual recognition of both Taiwan and China.
Lilly Lee Min-chen, a National Taiwan University graduate, was a participant in 2014’s Sunflower movement.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS