Outsiders do not know whether documents related to the 228 Massacre that Academia Sinica said it purchased five or six years ago contain any information about one of the victims — Lin Mo-sei (林茂生), former dean of the College of Liberal Arts at National Taiwan University and once the highest-educated person in Taiwan.
If any such information is available, but has not been made public, it would be a cause of irredeemable regret for Lin’s descendants, given that his second son, Lin Tsung-yi (林宗義), a psychiatrist and former director of mental health at the WHO, and his youngest son, Lin Tsung-kuang (林宗光), a professor of history, both died in the past five years.
“Mr Hu” (胡), the man who “half sold, half gave” the documents to Academia Sinica, said he is unhappy about the way in which the academy’s Institute of Modern History has been “taking its time” researching the documents and its failure to honor its promise of making them public. Hu has many reasons to be unhappy given the public’s desire for transitional justice and the eagerness of victims’ relatives to find out the truth.
The documents need to be sorted and investigated, but the research work should not be restricted to a single institution or specific academics. Tens of thousands of innocent people were massacred in the 228 Incident. While members of the generation who experienced those events firsthand, and sons and daughters of victims are still alive, the most urgent task is to make the documents public, rather than poring over them at a snail’s pace.
Publishing the documents related to this tragedy could be done at the same time as research, without conflict between the two. Making the documents public would also encourage academics who are interested in them to investigate them further.
Thanks to modern techniques of photocopying, scanning and digitizing, it is not difficult to preserve original documents, while also providing copies for outsiders to read. When the US government declassifies documents, they are all copied and handed over to the National Archives and Records Administration, which makes them accessible to the public. Hundreds of researchers visit the archives every day to read documents.
The rediscovery of some documents related to the 228 Massacre and the White Terror era could help clarify some of the facts related to the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime’s violent rule and its scant regard for human rights.
The military police have recently been caught “unlawfully” searching someone’s property for lost documents. This act, and the motives behind it, are incompatible with a democratic system. Any further documents that come to light as a result of this incident should be made public as soon as possible.
When people call for transitional justice, it means they want to know the truth and where responsibility lies. Making documents accessible is the most important step in seeking the truth. The documents that Academia Sinica purchased should all be copied and made public. It is not acceptable for the truth to go on being kept under wraps in the name of research.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS