Last month’s 228 Memorial Day marked the 69th anniversary of the 228 Incident in 1947. However, the historical significance of the event was outshone by the bright lights of this year’s lantern festivals, which took place across Taiwan during the three-day 228 holiday weekend.
It has been almost 70 years since the troops dispatched by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) landed in Keelung in early March 1947 and initiated a crackdown and massacre following the events of Feb. 28 that year.
Seven decades later, the Political Warfare Bureau’s and the military police’s recent harassment of a collector of historical documents during a search for missing classified government documents brought the White Terror era back to life. At a time when Taiwanese society is involved in a debate about transitional justice, this incident shocked the nation.
These so-called “missing classified government documents” are letters of accusation from informers active during the 1960s and 1970s. Is the bureau investigating the alleged online sale of such documents to protect the parties involved, or is the military still conducting surveillance of the civil sector today?
The Taiwan Garrison Command was abolished many years ago when the Martial Law era finally came to an end, but this incident raises the question of whether Taiwanese are still being monitored through a complex surveillance network.
Although Taiwan is moving further along the road to democracy, with the nation’s third transition of power about to take place, this incident also raises the question of whether the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) party-state system remains unchanged.
As the government has failed to address the issue of transitional justice, the political terrorism that accumulated during the Martial Law era has blocked Taiwan from shining a light on its history. The accomplices to this structure continue to share the spoils inside the system while eroding Taiwan’s vitality.
The biggest historical irony of all is that even President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has repeatedly been accused of having been an informer and a secret agent.
In 2008, Academia Sinica’s Institute of Taiwan History purchased a set of letters containing details about people connected to the 228 Incident and the White Terror era. The documents were part of the private collection of Lin Ting-li (林頂立), who had headed the now-defunct Secrets Bureau. The documents were later sold by members of Lin’s family to collectors of historical materials.
According to those who browsed the documents, which were signed by Lin, an evil mind was revealed between his neat calligraphy. On the documents, the names of people who were overcome and suffocated by the events of the time were all recorded, highlighting the political terrorism of the KMT’s party-state. These documents are but one small part of the recorded history of the White Terror era, and a lot more remain hidden.
Since the collapse of the communist states in eastern Europe in the late 1980s, they have undergone political reconstruction through transitional justice.
In comparison, despite the lifting of martial law in 1987 and the following quiet revolution that led to the nation’s democratization, Taiwan still suffers from the intangible darkness that remains following the long period of martial law. It is because this shadow continues to hang over Taiwan and its democratic development that Taiwan cannot be thoroughly localized and reborn.
Entangled in the web between victims tolerating this situation and unexposed offenders, the shadow of political terrorism continues to eat away at people’s minds and close the door to their hearts. What must be done to expel this demon? This is precisely what transitional justice is all about.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS