When EVA Airways Corp chairman Chang Kuo-wei (張國煒), the youngest son of Evergreen Group founder Chang Yung-fa (張榮發), announced his father’s will, according to which Chang Kuo-wei is to inherit all his father’s assets and take over as president of the Evergreen Group, his brothers were not happy.
The eldest son, Chang Kuo-hua (張國華), and the other brothers, who hold the majority of shares, called an emergency meeting to dissolve the operational headquarters and abolish the position of president only one day after Chang Kuo-wei succeeded to the position. He will also face a battle to maintain his position as chairman of EVA Airways as the inheritance battle turns into a soap opera.
The court battle over the inheritance of late Formosa Plastics Group chairman Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) is still unresolved and the fight among four brothers over the division of Mayfull Group resulted in the shooting deaths of three of the brothers. The fight over Evergreen once again makes it clear that the operation of family businesses has become the biggest problem of domestic business groups and is turning into a nightmare in terms of the sustainable operation of publicly traded companies.
Three-quarters of publicly traded Taiwanese companies are controlled by families and 10 families control one-quarter of the value of the TAIEX. The death of a company’s founder can jeopardize the existence of that company: Only one-third of family businesses survive the second generation of family operations, and a mere one-10th survive the third generation. Businesses owned and run by ethnic Chinese families remain in the hands of the family even when they are publicly traded. Infighting among heirs is one of the main reasons for fluctuation in these companies’ market value.
These inheritance problems can be divided into two categories: Battles over ownership and battles over operational control. In Taiwan, a generational change often involves not only ownership, but also the appointment of a chief executive among the heirs to continue the family’s control over operations. The ability and charisma of the heir frequently falls far behind that of the founder, but it is still very uncommon that operational risk is minimized by passing power on to a professional manager.
Passing the baton to a child involves complex emotions and family relations, and regardless of whether the founder of a big company hands power to a son or a daughter, they should make clear plans ahead of time and give their successor systematic training. The later powers are handed down, the more difficult it is for the next generation and the heavier the impact on the company. That Chang Yung-fa could treat a publicly traded company as his private property and decide who should inherit ownership is not compatible with the law. In addition, while Chang appointed a successor in his will, failure to divide share ownership in time has meant that his final will cannot be fulfilled.
Unlike the inheritance problems in traditional businesses, Taiwan’s high-tech industry is not suffering from the problems of family ownership. Despite that, it is proving difficult to pass power on to professional managers. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s first attempt at a transfer of power failed, with its chairman, Morris Chang (張忠謀), being forced to remain in control although he is 84. The increasing age of managers also has a negative effect on Taiwan’s ability to respond to globalization and embrace transformation to adapt to the creative economy. Acer Inc founder and former chairman Stan Shih (施振榮) set an example by handing power to professional managers to help build a sustainable domestic high-tech industry.
Exceptions aside, selecting and training professional managers to take over remains a serious challenge for Taiwan’s major businesses.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030